On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 12:31:09PM +0200, Taylan Kammer wrote:
> On 06.08.2021 16:33, Vijay Marupudi wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I was curious if Guile would be willing to provide a series of
> > new procedures for resizing contiguous memory regions.
[...]
> Sounds like a good idea to me. I didn'
On 07.08.2021 13:09, Maxime Devos wrote:
>
> A problem is that this prevents optimisations and can currently
> introduce bugs in concurrent code. Consider the following code:
>
> [... snip ... ]
>
> Greetings,
> Maxime.
>
Couldn't we just state that resizing a vector/bytevector is a
thread-u
Vijay Marupudi schreef op vr 06-08-2021 om 09:33 [-0500]:
> Hello!
>
> I was curious if Guile would be willing to provide a series of
> new procedures for resizing contiguous memory regions.
>
> (bytevector-resize! new-size [fill])
> (vector-resize! new-size [fill])
>
> The [fill] parameter co
On 06.08.2021 16:33, Vijay Marupudi wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I was curious if Guile would be willing to provide a series of
> new procedures for resizing contiguous memory regions.
>
> (bytevector-resize! new-size [fill])
> (vector-resize! new-size [fill])
>
> The [fill] parameter could be used if
