Mike Gran writes:
> OK, fair enough. I'll push a patch on mkdtemp! in a day or two if
> you're good with the idea. (I asked on IRC.) But, one thing I'd like
> to change, if you don't mind, is the split into scm_i_mkdtemp and
> scm_mkdtemp because there is no internal client of scm_i_mkdtemp.
Oh
Hi Thien-Thi,
your timing is fortuitous. I just spent the christmas holidays delving
into GUILE 1.8's heap expansion strategy and found and fixed a bug
with it.
See
https://github.com/hanwen/guile/commit/9b32504780e0b604196be866b8c36079891e3cd6
How does code review for proposed patches work the
