Re: "guix potluck", a moveable feast

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >>> To work around that, I think the server should resolve package >>> specifications when the potluck.scm file is submitted, and insert each >>> package in the Guix package graph of the moment. Does that make sense? >>> Maybe that’s what you were describing

Re: RFC: (ice-9 sandbox)

Andy Wingo skribis: > On Fri 31 Mar 2017 23:41, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Andy Wingo skribis: >> >>> On Fri 31 Mar 2017 13:33, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> >> [...] >> > ;; These can only form part of a safe binding set if no mutable > ;; pair is exposed to

Re: [PATCH] Throw an exception when mutating read-only data

Hi Andy, I'm mostly clueless on Guile's internals, but this patch caught my eye, given the potential for conflict with GDBs use of libguile. On 04/02/2017 11:11 AM, Andy Wingo wrote: > +void > +scm_maybe_throw_exception_for_mutation_of_read_only_data (void *addr) > +{ > + if (!find_mapped_elf_i