Hello,
Attached...
Note that make check leaves the following toplevel file [a symlink to itself]
behind:
filesys-test-link.tmp
I guess make check itself should be patched but I don't know how.
David
From 8a0878a17a5f2ff7a74ec636ef646916adf51975 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: D
Hello,
Attached...
David
From fb74ffddbfae759054838e9291c7a25f65044052 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Pirotte
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:24:50 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Autoconf macro GUILE_PKG should track 2.2 as well
* meta/guile.m4: Adding 2.2 to the list of avalable version of
Hello,
Attached...
David
From af41a51504f548043824013aa532b6516970aee7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Pirotte
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:02:33 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] Do not track html dirs and files
* .gitignore: Do not track html files, nor directories.
---
.gitignore | 1 +
1 f
Andy Wingo wrote:
>Would you like to propose a specific patch to the documentation?
Sure. Patch attached.
-zefram
--- a/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi 2014-03-20 20:21:21.0 +
+++ b/doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi 2016-06-24 18:57:59.088243245 +0100
@@ -2461,8 +2461,8 @@
@cindex UTC
@cindex TA
Greets,
Time is not my area of expertise :) Cc'ing guile-devel to see if
someone can review the ideas.
Would you like to propose a specific patch to the documentation? The
file is in doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi.
Regards,
Andy
On Fri 13 Nov 2015 13:58, Zefram writes:
> The manual says, in the
On Fri 24 Jun 2016 18:18, Matt Wette writes:
> On my mac (getrlimit ‘as) => #f #f. So it looks like the args to
> setrlimit are 100 MB and #f. Is the program supposed to die gracefully
> at 100 MB? When I (accidentally) stopped the program (under gdb) the
> process was using 56 GB of memory.
App
On 24 Jun 2016, at 18:18, Matt Wette wrote:
>
>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Andy Wingo wrote:
>>
>> On Thu 23 Jun 2016 14:59, Daniel Llorens writes:
>>
> We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.1.3.
Tried on my Mac OS 10.10.5 against Macports 2.3.4 w/ gcc-mp-5.
>>>
> On Jun 23, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Andy Wingo wrote:
>
> On Thu 23 Jun 2016 14:59, Daniel Llorens writes:
>
We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.1.3.
>>>
>>> Tried on my Mac OS 10.10.5 against Macports 2.3.4 w/ gcc-mp-5.
>>> make check generated FAIL for test-language and test-st
> On Jun 21, 2016, at 5:53 AM, Matt Wette wrote:
>
>> On Jun 21, 2016, at 12:50 AM, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
>> wrote:
>>
>> Matt Wette writes:
>>
>>> nyacc is an all-guile implementation of yacc and comes with a c99
>>> parser, available from www.nongnu.org.
>>> The parser outputs pa
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: Andy Wingo , guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:49:17 +0200
>
> > diff --git a/libguile/posix.c b/libguile/posix.c
> > index 2654716..35b920f 100644
> > --- a/libguile/posix.c
> > +++ b/libguile/posix.c
> > @@ -84,6 +84,10 @@
> > #if HAVE
> From: Andy Wingo
> Cc: l...@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:45:36 +0200
>
> Thanks!
>
> I think it looks pretty good. I wouldn't mind committing as-is. I
> would like to hear what Ludovic or Mark thinks before doing do; WDYT?
It's obviously your call how to proceed
Eli Zaretskii skribis:
> commit 44f8eebf9850431790b23b031f5b6e90fb3de777
> Author: Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Fri Jun 24 12:45:02 2016 +0300
>
> Provide support for open-process and related functions on MS-Windows
>
> * libguile/w32-proc.c: New file, with MinGW support code for
> s
On Fri 24 Jun 2016 11:51, Eli Zaretskii writes:
> This is a re-spin of the patches last posted here:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2014-08/msg00015.html
>
> At Andy's suggestion, I've removed most of the Windows-specific code
> to the new Windows-specific file w32-proc.c, l
This is a re-spin of the patches last posted here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2014-08/msg00015.html
At Andy's suggestion, I've removed most of the Windows-specific code
to the new Windows-specific file w32-proc.c, leaving just the minimum
changes in posix.c itself. The patc
Andy Wingo skribis:
> On Mon 20 Jul 2015 00:10, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> The ‘sanitize-response’ procedure systematically loads the whole
>> response body in memory, which causes obvious scalability issues (this
>> is in 2.0.11.)
>>
>> In particular, when a request handler retu
On Fri 24 Jun 2016 05:53, Lev Lazinskiy writes:
> I am new to guile and using git the "manual way" so I apologize if
> there are any mistakes here. Attached is a patch that updates the
> download page to include Fedora instructions (there is a broken link
> to fedora with no instructions). I also
On Mon 20 Jul 2015 00:10, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> The ‘sanitize-response’ procedure systematically loads the whole
> response body in memory, which causes obvious scalability issues (this
> is in 2.0.11.)
>
> In particular, when a request handler returns a port-taking procedure as
Hi Everyone,
I am new to guile and using git the "manual way" so I apologize if there
are any mistakes here. Attached is a patch that updates the download
page to include Fedora instructions (there is a broken link to fedora
with no instructions). I also added instructions for getting guile
i
18 matches
Mail list logo
