Hi again!
:)
> With the stable-2.0 or master branches, the current behavior is:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (oop goops))
> scheme@(guile-user)> (define-class ()
> ... (foo #:getter foo #:init-keyword #:foo))
> scheme@(guile-user)> (define-class ())
> scheme@(guil
Hi :)
On Fri 06 Feb 2015 18:09, David Pirotte writes:
> (2) I have a different answer from my guile version for the second
> part [which I think is the correct answer, maybe you wanted to paste
> some other code [?], don't know.
Part of my mail described buggy Guile 2.0. Please re-read to be s
Hello Andy,
> May I first please reduce your test case. Here is an equivalent
> version:
sure, especially because it is not 'my' test case :) which got us very
confused: when you were talking about this one, I was thinking about
another... which to remove the confusion I
Hello,
May I first please reduce your test case. Here is an equivalent
version:
(use-modules (oop goops))
(define-class ()
(foo #:getter foo #:init-keyword #:foo))
(define-class ())
(define obj (make #:foo 34))
(define-method (foo (self ))
(pk "ahoy!")
(next-method))
(
