Hello,
guile-clutter
clutter-devel: add custom bindings for ClutterPoint and ClutterSize
Patch review solicited.
Thanks,
David
>From fd2da7831c966034649392ebac00214a3660b4cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David PIROTTE
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:12:45 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 4/4]
On Mon 28 Apr 2014 10:24, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I would have preferred to rebase SMOBs on top of structs, with the added
> documentation as to how they can be accessed from Scheme, but I suppose
> this is ruled out by the SCM_SETCDR issue above?
We can think of doing this in th
On Sun 27 Apr 2014 18:46, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
writes:
> FYI I need need the gc mark interface for my prolog variables in order
> to hope for garbage collecting of prolog programs, e.g. clean the
> variables bindings in the prolog stack for variables that no longer is
> referenced. It is poss
On Sun 27 Apr 2014 18:00, Mark H Weaver writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> I propose to provide a new interface that will eventually make SMOBs
>> obsolete. This new interface is based on structs with raw fields -- the
>> 'u' fields. (See
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/master/guile.h
Hello!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> 7) There is legacy code out there that uses e.g. SCM_SETCDR to set
> smob fields. (This is terrible, but it exists:
> https://github.com/search?q=SCM_SETCDR+smob&ref=cmdform&type=Code
> for an example.)
[...]
> I propose to provide a new interface
