Re: [PATCH] Implement open-process and related functions on MinGW

2014-02-28 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Mark H Weaver > Cc: l...@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 05:20:11 -0500 > > >> > # define WIFEXITED(stat_val) (((stat_val) & 0xC000) == 0) > >> > # define WIFSIGNALED(stat_val) (((stat_val) & 0xC000) != 0) > >> > >> WIFSIGNALED(x) returns true if either o

Re: [PATCH] Implement open-process and related functions on MinGW

2014-02-28 Thread Mark H Weaver
Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Mark H Weaver >> Cc: l...@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:22:19 -0500 >> >> However, I don't want to use the "0xC200 + SIGNAL" convention >> "between Guile and itself" that you've invented. Instead, based on what >> you wrote, I gue

Re: [PATCH] Implement open-process and related functions on MinGW

2014-02-28 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Mark H Weaver > Cc: l...@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:22:19 -0500 > > However, I don't want to use the "0xC200 + SIGNAL" convention > "between Guile and itself" that you've invented. Instead, based on what > you wrote, I guess that we should make WIFSIGNA