Hello, list!
Is using SWIG[1] is endorsed for writing Guile wrappers to C library? I
make such bindings for libircclient[2] for my project, but it would be
nice, if it would find way to official Guile tree. Are here some
guidelines about it?
Also, question of style of Lisp code. It seems, that
() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
() Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:31:00 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen skribis:
> My reading of sendfile(2) is that it does its best to send as much
> as possible, but does not guarantee sending everything. What it
> does succeed in sending, it reports to the caller.
Hi all,
One of the concerns regarding guile-log in it's earlier state was if
it code cope
with multithreading and the functional style of kanren suggests that stack based
logic programming will suffer with regard to multithreading. But on
the other hand
an optimized kanren is about 7x slower using
Thien-Thi Nguyen skribis:
> My reading of sendfile(2) is that it does its best to send as much as
> possible, but does not guarantee sending everything. What it does
> succeed in sending, it reports to the caller. The caller loops as
> desired, after evaluating (in some caller-meaningful way) t
On Apr 16, 2013, at 08:19, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Yes, I did, and generally I strongly prefer column [1], but we have to
> be very careful what changes we make in a stable release series that
> might break compatibility with existing code. I find this frustrating
> as well, which is one reason w
