Re: [PATCHES] Numeric improvements

2013-03-17 Thread Mark H Weaver
I've pushed improved versions of these patches to stable-2.0. Thanks, Mark

Re: set! semantics

2013-03-17 Thread Stefan Israelsson Tampe
On Sunday, March 17, 2013 09:36:29 AM Noah Lavine wrote: > Hello, > > I believe that keeping the box identity but not the box value is the > correct behavior of continuations under the Scheme standard. I agree > it's not intuitive, though. > > I have been thinking that we could eliminate variable

Re: set! semantics

2013-03-17 Thread Noah Lavine
Hello, I believe that keeping the box identity but not the box value is the correct behavior of continuations under the Scheme standard. I agree it's not intuitive, though. I have been thinking that we could eliminate variable boxes for mutable variables when we can prove that the continuation is