On Fri 01 Mar 2013 10:01, Daniel Llorens writes:
> scheme@(guile-user)> ,optimize (vector-ref #(1 2 3) 0)
> $1 = 1
> scheme@(guile-user)> ,optimize (array-ref #(1 2 3) 0)
> $2 = (array-ref '#(1 2 3) 0)
File a bug for this case, this sort of thing is totally fixable :)
> What I'd like from Guile
Hi Mike,
Mike Gran skribis:
> It is a standalone test that, in effect, checks to see if
> BDW-GC is running marking in its own non-Guile thread. If
> BDW does have parallel marking enabled, this test will SEGV.
> If it doesn't have parallel marking enabled, this test will pass.
Good.
FWIW, I’
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> From dadcb1512569c1be039fc75f0a2967e370939e42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mark H Weaver
> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 17:56:58 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix thread-unsafe lazy initializations.
>
> * libguile/debug.c (scm_local_eval):
> libguile/ports.c (scm_current_warn
Andy Wingo skribis:
> On Thu 28 Feb 2013 12:04, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo skribis:
>>
>>> On Thu 28 Feb 2013 04:24, Mark H Weaver writes:
>>>
Instead of having 'input_cd' and 'output_cd' point directly to the
platform's iconv_t structures, let's have them
Hello,
Julian Graham skribis:
> Andy and Ludo and I were discussing this on IRC and it was suggested
> that we move the question to the mailing list. I'm trying to compile
> some code -- using `gcc -pedantic' -- that invokes `scm_c_make_gsubr',
> and I'm getting the following warning:
>
> warn
On Mar 1, 2013, at 03:42, Noah Lavine wrote:
> There should still be an operator that splits in other ways, but I agree that
> we can shortcut that in many cases.
One think I like about the frame / cell split is that you know that the result
will have the same frame. So I imagine an operator
