Hey guys!
Now it's the time to officially release my potluck dish:
https://github.com/NalaGinrut/artanis
Let me re-introduce it:
* just read the README on the link I gave ;-P
Happy hacking!
Enjoy!
On 19 February 2013 00:25, Mike Gran wrote:
> From: Noah Lavine
>>Hello,
>>>On Wed 23 Jan 2013 13:20, Daniel Llorens writes:
>>>
In [2]: a = np.array([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9]])
>>>
In [4]: a[1]
Out[4]: array([4, 5, 6])
In [5]: a[1, 1]
Out[5]: 5
array-re
Hi Mikael,
Mikael Djurfeldt writes:
> I'm working on an mit-scheme compatibility module (compat mit-scheme)
> enabling Guile to read a (so far) subset of mit-scheme code.
>
> Now I have the problem that mit-scheme has the two constants
> #!optional and #!rest (mit-scheme extensions to the scheme
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Wed 23 Jan 2013 13:20, Daniel Llorens writes:
>
>> scheme@(guile-user)> (f64vector-ref #s64(1 2 3) 0)
>> $1 = #.#
>
> Here you are interpreting an int64 as a double, which should work, but
> this printed result is really bizarre and looks like a bug in our number
> printe
(Sorry for thinking publicly.)
The reason why I don't simply use guile-reader but start bugging you
about it is that it feels silly that Guile, which was originally
supposed to be able to support different languages, can't even support
the read syntax of a sibling scheme interpreter. It is somewh
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> If anyone is afraid about the effect this would have on reader
> performance, it is possible to compile %read-hash-procedures to a
> table of flags indicating exceptions.
But, given the current interface to reader extensions in the form
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> guilehall
guildhall
(I write too fast)
I'm working on an mit-scheme compatibility module (compat mit-scheme)
enabling Guile to read a (so far) subset of mit-scheme code.
Now I have the problem that mit-scheme has the two constants
#!optional and #!rest (mit-scheme extensions to the scheme standard).
I thought that I could support this
> From: David Pirotte
> do we actually have a matrice calculus [offset based the better] lib or
> binding
> or
> scheme package ? any pointer is welcome
There once was a package called guile-num. You can find it here.
www.nongnu.org/guile-num
But, it would take some work to get it to run aga
Heya,
> > One could imagine a Matlab-like syntax where array-ref has to have
> > the same number of indices as the underlying array, but, if an
> > index were replaced with a symbol, it would return a slice.
> >
> > if np is [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9]]
just in case it would [one day
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Mike Gran wrote:
> From: Noah Lavine
> > I haven't worked with the array functionality, so I might be missing
> > something, but I don't see why this is natural for array-ref.
>
> One could imagine a Matlab-like syntax where array-ref has to have
> the same numb
From: Noah Lavine
>Hello,
>>On Wed 23 Jan 2013 13:20, Daniel Llorens writes:
>>
>>> In [2]: a = np.array([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9]])
>>
>>> In [4]: a[1]
>>> Out[4]: array([4, 5, 6])
>>> In [5]: a[1, 1]
>>> Out[5]: 5
>>>
>>> array-ref can be extended very simply to do that. It accumulates o
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed 23 Jan 2013 13:20, Daniel Llorens
> writes:
>
> > In [2]: a = np.array([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9]])
> > In [4]: a[1]
> > Out[4]: array([4, 5, 6])
> > In [5]: a[1, 1]
> > Out[5]: 5
> >
> > array-ref can be extended
Hi,
On Wed 23 Jan 2013 13:20, Daniel Llorens writes:
> In [2]: a = np.array([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9]])
> In [4]: a[1]
> Out[4]: array([4, 5, 6])
> In [5]: a[1, 1]
> Out[5]: 5
>
> array-ref can be extended very simply to do that. It accumulates on the
> position as it is done now, but if
Hello,
I've hit an interesting issue in the RTL "call" instruction. I find that I
can't execute a call instruction where the return frame starts at the same
place that the procedure to call is at - it must start past there. That
doesn't match my expected behavior, but I'm not sure if my expectatio
Hi Daniel,
On Wed 23 Jan 2013 10:06, Andy Wingo writes:
> On Tue 22 Jan 2013 15:31, Daniel Llorens writes:
>
>> On Jan 21, 2013, at 17:11, Andy Wingo wrote:
>>
>> The patch attached applies over yours and is to document this function
>> and a couple others in the manual.
>
> Thanks, applied and
16 matches
Mail list logo
