Another clue,
Put this into a file and load it
(define (f x) (c))
(define-syntax c (lambda (x) (pk 'c) #t))
,x f shows
0(assert-nargs-ee/locals 1) ;; 1 arg, 0 locals
2(toplevel-ref 1);; #
4(tail-call 0) at
examp
I manage to make it work under master as well as guile-2.0
But the mutual code does not work. On the other hand what you said
some months ago was correct and I believe that we do not need special
constructs
for local syntax-classes anymore which if correct is a plus.
Please read the mail again is
Hey,
sorry for being so inactive in the last days (weeks?), I'm just having
some free time after my final exams here.
Yeah, I would assign the copyright to the FSF, I already read this but
thought I'll cope with that later^^
- Daniel
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Noa
