Andy Wingo writes:
> On Fri 17 Feb 2012 12:00, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Commit f9685f437312ea790981373ddc375b2a26ba9c4f changes
>> ‘build-lexical-var’ like this:
>>
>> (define-syntax-rule (build-lexical-var src id)
>> - (gensym (string-append (symbol->string id) " ")))
Hello all,
Here's a preliminary patch that greatly improves our 'tree-il->scheme'
decompiler. With this patch, psyntax-pp.scm is now less than half of
its previous size (over 800 kilobytes saved), and is _far_ more
readable. In almost all cases the original source identifiers are used
instead of
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Andy Wingo wrote:
>
>> * datum labels for circular and shared substructures
>
> Yes!
Note this is one thing a reference implementation will
be provided for.
>> * nan? and finite? now accept complex numbers
>> (should probably change inf? and infinite? as well)
Hi Mark!
Hope all is well. I'm behind as usual. Just an additional perspective
here.
On Thu 09 Feb 2012 06:09, Mark H Weaver writes:
> R7RS TODO
I think you probably agree, but we should be clear about it in any case:
the current drafts are not final. I look forward to R7RS being a report
t
Hi,
On Thu 16 Feb 2012 22:05, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I’m actually arguing that these feature symbols are largely useless, for
> they cannot be rigorously specified and would almost certainly lead to
> misuses.
I very much agree. I think that the R7RS should specify no features
Hi all,
An update on this issue. For context:
On Wed 08 Feb 2012 23:10, Andy Wingo writes:
> I was testing out the threaded web server and it was working well. Then
> I tried it out with tekuti, a blog engine that uses git as the backend.
> It uses (ice-9 popen) to talk to the git binaries.
Hi Ian,
Ian Price skribis:
> Some manual examples, however, do include imports
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Hash-Table-Reference.html
> includes srfis 1 and 13. An example in
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Dynamic-FFI.html
> includes (rnrs bytevec
Mark H Weaver writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>>> Scheme has a very useful property which your proposed syntax would
>>> destroy: any valid expression can be substituted for any other valid
>>> expression, and the result has the same meaning except for the
>>> substitution.
>>
>> guile> (displ
