David Kastrup writes:
> I assume that the above list could contain more than a single call of
> (suspend).
Yes, of course.
>> For example, (%% list 1 2 3 (begin (suspend) 4) 5) expands to:
>>
>> (call-with-values
>> (lambda () (parallel (suspendable list)
>>(s
Probably the easiest way to think about it is that (the-environment)
acts like (list (lambda () ) ...), with one `lambda' for each
expression that you will later pass to `local-eval'. Calling
`local-eval' simply calls the appropriate procedure in that list.
Of course, it can't actually work that
Hi Andi,
On 2012-01-07T04:34:39 EET, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Greetings, Guilers!
>
> I hope this message finds all of you well: you, and yours, and all the
> beings in your lives. It was really a pleasure to hack with yall last
> year.
[snip]
> Again, speaking personally, 2011 has really bee
Mark H Weaver writes:
> I'm still not entirely clear on what you want,
Well, I said there were elements missing in the picture, so it is not
like I am entirely clear on it myself.
> but perhaps you're looking for delimited continuations, a.k.a
> composable continuations, partial continuations,
Mark H Weaver writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>> I am still fuzzy on what local-eval will do when the current module at
>> the time of the-environment is different from that at the time of
>> local-eval.
>
> (the-environment) saves the module (where it is textually located) in
What does "where
Mark H Weaver writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>>>
What do other people think?
>>>
>>> As you said, R5RS makes it clear that there can be several (in the sense
>>> of eq?) empty strings, so I think wh
David Kastrup writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>>
>>> What do other people think?
>>
>> As you said, R5RS makes it clear that there can be several (in the sense
>> of eq?) empty strings, so I think what you did is the right thing.
>
> Si
David Kastrup writes:
> I am still fuzzy on what local-eval will do when the current module at
> the time of the-environment is different from that at the time of
> local-eval.
(the-environment) saves the module (where it is textually located) in
the lexical environment object. If (the-environme
Mark H Weaver writes:
> I'd like to make one last plea to include my simple `local-eval'
> implementation in 2.0.4. My hope is that if we can ship it soon enough,
> versions of Guile without `local-eval' will be rare enough to enable
> Lilypond to eliminate their ugly hacks and simply declare th
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>
>> What do other people think?
>
> As you said, R5RS makes it clear that there can be several (in the sense
> of eq?) empty strings, so I think what you did is the right thing.
Since it uses the same verbiage with reg
10 matches
Mail list logo
