Update of bug #34140 (project guile):
Status:None => Fixed
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #2:
Fixed in git, by coll
Howdy!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> On Tue 29 Nov 2011 14:18, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo skribis:
>>
>>> On Tue 29 Nov 2011 12:06, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>>
Could you run the stuff under gc-benchmarks/ with and without the
heuristic, as in [0]?
>>
Greets,
On Tue 29 Nov 2011 14:18, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo skribis:
>
>> On Tue 29 Nov 2011 12:06, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>
>>> Could you run the stuff under gc-benchmarks/ with and without the
>>> heuristic, as in [0]?
>>>
>>> [0] http://thread.gmane.
Andy Wingo skribis:
> On Tue 29 Nov 2011 12:06, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
>> I tried to reproduce the infamous iconv issue, which would have been a
>> simple way to check, but failed:
>>
>> (with-fluids ((%default-port-encoding "UTF-16BE"))
>> (let loop () (open-output-
Hey!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> On Tue 29 Nov 2011 12:06, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Could you run the stuff under gc-benchmarks/ with and without the
>> heuristic, as in [0]?
>>
>> [0] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/7803
IIRC the “Guile” lines below correspond to wh
On Tue 29 Nov 2011 12:06, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Could you run the stuff under gc-benchmarks/ with and without the
> heuristic, as in [0]?
>
> [0] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/7803
Adding a FSD=2 entry:
benchmark: `gc-benchmarks/gcbench.scm'
On Tue 29 Nov 2011 12:06, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> RET should never be left uninitialized, and the caller should be
> prepared to deal with RET == 0.
Oops, will fix.
> (The code itself doesn’t have to #ifdef __linux__ because other OSes
> provides an implementation that mimics Li
Hi Andy!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> On Tue 29 Nov 2011 00:10, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo skribis:
>>
>>> On Sun 27 Nov 2011 22:25, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>>
The problem is that this measurement doesn’t allow us to differentiate
between a growing