Andy Wingo writes:
> we miss your hack-energy in Guile :-)
Thanks for the encouragement, and also for forgiving my frequently poor
social skills :) Free time has been scarce in the last 8 months (thanks
to my 8-month-old nephew) but I would indeed like to finally get to work
on improving Guile's
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> It’s not completely satisfying either because --locale is not in
> 2.0.[0-3], so users who really need it will need some configury;
> furthermore, from 2.2.x on, it will be mostly unneeded.
>
> Yet, a choice has to be made between this hack and the other one
Hi,
syntax-parse is quite a heavy where it basically defines a syntax-case +
verifying logic from the beginning.
What I have played with a lighter version of that code and a kind of system
around it that worked by
piggy-pack on guiles syntax-case.
It's not much code needed to get something that
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Stefan,
>
> I must apologize for not responding to your mails! Or rather, for
> responding so late. Apologies in any case.
>
np
> On Sat 14 May 2011 20:57, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
> writes:
>
> > (macroexpand '(let ((A : integer 1)) A))
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Mike Gran skribis:
>
>> Here's a suggestion. One could add an option to the guile
>> interpreter's command line args (--locale=ARG perhaps) that has the
>> effect of calling setlocale(LC_ALL,"ARG") first thing. If --locale
>> is called with
