Re: benchmarks vs racket

2011-10-12 Thread Andy Wingo
Hi, I've added some historical numbers as a fifth column here (hah!), corresponding to our performance at 1.9.7, relative to mzscheme then. Assuming mzscheme has improved, this is pretty great improvement over the last 18 months. On Wed 12 Oct 2011 18:24, Andy Wingo writes: >

benchmarks vs racket

2011-10-12 Thread Andy Wingo
Hi all, I was recently reminded of the following benchmarks: http://www.cs.utah.edu/~mflatt/benchmarks-20100126/log3/Benchmarks.html All the caveats I just sent to guile-user still apply, but benchmarks are fun. I re-ran this one with current Racket (v5.1.3 from Debian) and Guile (git). The

select issue

2011-10-12 Thread rixed
I still got this patch (attached) on v2.0.2 on my own repo, which fixes runtime behavior when more than 1024 files are opened. Can someone please comment/commit/reject it ? commit da70784bd2048f7f1a8934711e5e24f975d68b0b Author: Cedric Cellier Date: Tue Jun 21 16:30:45 2011 +0200 Fix fpor