I talked with cky on IRC. And I realized that I made a mistake.
He needs a cycle-printer. But in my case, I just want to avoid a cycle
printing.
So that's fine.
--
GNU Powered it
GPL Protected it
GOD Blessed it
HFG - NalaGinrut
--hacker key--
v4sw7CUSMhw6ln6pr8OSFck4ma9u8MLSOFw3WDXGm7g/l8Li6e7t
> [Crossposted from bug-guile@ since my message isn't posting there. :-(]
>
> Hi there,
>
> I've been playing around with Guile's implementation of SRFI 45 (which
> uses SRFI 9), and have noticed something interesting: if you run the
> following code in the REPL, printing out the value of the pro
[Crossposted from bug-guile@ since my message isn't posting there. :-(]
Hi there,
I've been playing around with Guile's implementation of SRFI 45 (which
uses SRFI 9), and have noticed something interesting: if you run the
following code in the REPL, printing out the value of the promise will
caus
Andy Wingo writes:
> Hi!
>
> An update on the guild-hall.
>
> On Fri 15 Jul 2011 13:55, Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> git clone git://gitorious.org/~wingo/dorodango/guildhall.git
>
> It is still here, with lots of activity, mostly administrative. It can
> now be installed, has minimal docs (from do
Hello!
On Mon 25 Jul 2011 11:24, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> BT Templeton skribis:
>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Here I disagree. From the perspective of semantics and security, it's
>>> important to be able to make assertions as to the type of value returned
>>> by a pr
Hi!
An update on the guild-hall.
On Fri 15 Jul 2011 13:55, Andy Wingo writes:
> git clone git://gitorious.org/~wingo/dorodango/guildhall.git
It is still here, with lots of activity, mostly administrative. It can
now be installed, has minimal docs (from dorodango), and passes
distcheck. I t
Hi BT,
BT Templeton skribis:
> Andy Wingo writes:
[...]
>> Here I disagree. From the perspective of semantics and security, it's
>> important to be able to make assertions as to the type of value returned
>> by a procedure -- that (current-input-port) returns a port. The same
>> goes for (c
Hi Andreas!
On Sat 23 Jul 2011 12:37, Andreas Rottmann writes:
> dorodango's dependencies are quite stable, so duplicating them in the
> guidhall version should not be much of an issue. As for reducing
> their number, I've posted a mail with some ideas about how this could
> be started off a wh
