David Pirotte writes:
> Looking at 'Procedure Index', for example not really knowing what your
> looking for
> but presumably starting with letter 's', as a 'pure' scheme programmer,
> reaching
> scm-xxx, you'll have to hit more or less 33 times page down [depending on your
> display and browse
Jan Nieuwenhuizen schrieb:
> https://github.com/janneke/gub/blob/guile-2.0/gub/specs/guile.py
> https://github.com/janneke/gub/tree/guile-2.0/patches
Thanks for pointing me to this project. This looks really
promising and I would be glad for learning from that.
1) The pthread issue
As fa
Hello Jan,
On Fri 20 May 2011 15:56, Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> I read the thread and it looked like this patch was close to being
>> accepted
>
> Yes, it looks like that.
Heh ;)
> My first simplistic patch to just make guile canonicalize_file_name work
> on mingw took
Andy Wingo writes:
> This patch has the obvious race condition.
Yes.
> Why does the `rename' library routine not work on Win32?
Good question.
> The man page says
>
> CONFORMING TO
>4.3BSD, C89, C99, POSIX.1-2001.
>
> so I am surprised about this behavior.
Yes, that's interest
Andy Wingo writes:
>> * libguile/load.c (scm_init_load_path) [MINGW32]: Use $LOCALAPPDATA
>> to avoid having a NULL cachedir, while still allowing override by
>> using $XDG_CACHE_HOME.
>
> What sets LOCALAPPDATA? If it is the right thing on Windows then I am
> OK with applying this
Hi Jan,
On Fri 20 May 2011 15:47, Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>> Is anyone interested in implementing a path library?
>
> What's the status/estimate on this -- of course I agree this would be
> nicer, otoh, a patch to these three files is available that makes guile
> run on mingw right now.
Uncle
Andy Wingo writes:
> If mingw defines variants of these routines, why are we not using them
> directly?
Good question. That may well be a better approach.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
Andy Wingo writes:
> I read the thread and it looked like this patch was close to being
> accepted
Yes, it looks like that.
My first simplistic patch to just make guile canonicalize_file_name work
on mingw took my an hour to write and test.
I spent four full working days arguing with gnulib of
Andy Wingo writes:
> I don't much like this approach. Besides mixing in a heuristic on all
> machines that is win32-specific, it makes c:/foo.scm collide with
> d:/foo.scm in the cache, and fails to also modify load.c which also does
> autocompilation in other contexts.
Yes, a newer version of t
On Fri 20 May 2011 14:48, Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Volker Grabsch writes:
>
>> 1) My first attempt is to enable threads via:
>
> Just to remind you that we have an automated working mingw cross build
> setup here
>
> https://github.com/janneke/gub
Cool :-)
Just to remind *you* that I hav
Volker Grabsch writes:
> 1) My first attempt is to enable threads via:
Just to remind you that we have an automated working mingw cross build
setup here
https://github.com/janneke/gub
with guile-specific recipe and patches up at
https://github.com/janneke/gub/blob/guile-2.0/gub/specs/g
Hello Andy,
thanks for the quick reply and for accepting and cleaning up
my patches so far.
Andy Wingo schrieb:
> > CC net_db.lo
> > net_db.c:460:1: error: 'AI_ALL' undeclared here (not in a function)
> > net_db.c:460:1: error: expression in static assertion is not an integer
> > net_db.c:4
Hi Volker,
Thanks for the report.
On Tue 17 May 2011 01:01, Volker Grabsch writes:
> "fix-include-error-in-gen-scmconfig.patch"
> The patch re-introduces a change which I already proposed
> in my last patch: You can't use $(AM_CPPFLAGS) for the native
> build, because it adds "-
13 matches
Mail list logo
