Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> However, I’m wondering whether we should not just
>>> squarely do away with the binary/textual distinction
How would you handle port position? From R6RS[1]:
(port-has-port-position? port) procedure
(port-position port) procedure
The port-has-port-posit
Hi,
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Fri 22 Apr 2011 21:48, Phil writes:
>
>> Alright, cool. Just to be clear the end goal is to include this in
>> Guile eventually, right?
>
> Yes, if it is of good quality and compatible with other Lua
> implementations, I'd be happy to include it in Guile. (Dunno wha
Hi Andreas!
Andreas Rottmann writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
>> However, I’m wondering whether we should not just squarely do away with
>> the binary/textual distinction, and just write:
>>
>> (define (binary-port? p) #t)
>>
>> What do people with experience with pure
On Thu 21 Apr 2011 12:21, Wolfgang J Moeller writes:
> In my browser, searching the Guile Reference Manual
> ( http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual) Indices
> for GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH ... no hits ...
An open bug, yes; hrm. Adding Mark Harig to the Cc, who had a plan
for
fixing this
Hello Andy,
Andy Wingo schrieb:
> On Fri 01 Apr 2011 20:50, Volker Grabsch writes:
>
> > "Portability fixes for win32 cross compiling"
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/guile-devel@gnu.org/msg05308.html
>
> Ah yes. Thanks for that link. And thank you for your ongoing patience
> :-)
You
On Fri 22 Apr 2011 21:48, Phil writes:
> Alright, cool. Just to be clear the end goal is to include this in
> Guile eventually, right?
Yes, if it is of good quality and compatible with other Lua
implementations, I'd be happy to include it in Guile. (Dunno what
others think on this point.)
Chee
