Re: Cross-compiling Guile 2.0

On Sat 05 Mar 2011 20:47, Neil Jerram writes: > In principle, how should Guile 2.0 be cross-compiled? I'm thinking > mostly of the part of the build that compiles all the installed > modules. I have never cross-compiled anything, so I really don't know. Ideally we could make a cross-compiling

Re: Welcome new contributor Mark Harig!

On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 09:44:40PM -0500, Noah Lavine wrote: Yes, welcome! It's great to have you! On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > Andy Wingo writes: > >> Hey all, >> >> Let's welcome new contributor Mark Harig!  Mark is interested in >> documentation, but who knows to

Cross-compiling Guile 2.0

In principle, how should Guile 2.0 be cross-compiled? I'm thinking mostly of the part of the build that compiles all the installed modules. I think target emulation is needed, using QEMU, and in particular that it wouldn't work to set GUILE_FOR_BUILD to a build-system-native guile, because that w

Re: Set debug output width in REPL

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >>> Mark also wrote: >>> Better yet, maybe it should be an optional attribute of the output port, >>> which would allow pretty-print and truncated-print to use it as well. >>> Output ports attached to terminals could determine the terminal width >>> from the O

Re: Set debug output width in REPL

On Sat 05 Mar 2011 14:26, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Andy Wingo writes: > >> On Mon 21 Feb 2011 07:02, Mike Gran writes: >> >>> I find that the backtrace output in the REPL is too constrained >>> my verbose code. The attached patch would let one set the >>> >>> width of the backt

Re: Error in make check building guile-lib for guile 2.0. trap-enable unbound

Hi Neil, Neil Jerram writes: > I had a feeling that a lot (or even maybe all) of guile-lib got merged > into the main Guile distribution. So are you sure you still need > separate guile-lib at all? Only (sxml ...), (texinfo ...), and (statprof) got merged, IIRC. The other modules are still un

Re: Set debug output width in REPL

Hi, Andy Wingo writes: > On Mon 21 Feb 2011 07:02, Mike Gran writes: > >> I find that the backtrace output in the REPL is too constrained >> my verbose code. The attached patch would let one set the >> >> width of the backtrace and locals meta-commands. >> >> What do you think? > > Applied, t