Hi,
Bruce Korb writes:
>>> > By replacing "scm_listofnull" with "ag_scm_listofnull" and initializing
>>> > it:
>>> >SCM ag_scm_listofnull = scm_list_1 (SCM_EOL);
>> In Guile < 1.9.3, you have to scm_gc_protect_object this value
>> (info "(guile) Garbage Collection Functions").
>
> and it s
On 02/22/11 20:15, Ken Raeburn wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2011, at 07:00, Hans Aberg wrote:
Perhaps 2.0 should have some check that it gets the right header.
>
> It wouldn't be that tough to do something like:
> #define scm_init_guile scm_init_guile_v2_0 // encode version in symbol
[...]
> and te
I wrote:
> I recently noticed that scm_i_big2dbl contains some crufty and
> inefficient compatibility code to work around unspecified rounding
> behavior of mpz_get_d in GMP prior to version 4.2. GMP 4.2 was released
> in March 2006 and has been in Debian since sarge (now oldstable).
Sorry, I mea
Hello,
I tried looking at it a bit. First of all, your cleanups are awesome. :)
Unfortunately, I need to ask for help in order to work on this more. I
thought I would first move the code-generating functions to their own
module. It seems like this should be a simple and obviously-correct
transfor
Jan Nieuwenhuizen schreef op do 03-02-2011 om 21:20 [+0100]:
This morning I've spend some time to reduce this problem into
a single scheme file, see attached.
Again, here's what happens when I run it twice, starting from
a clean cache.
First run
12:47:07 janneke@vuurvlieg:~/vc/schikkers
