The date listed on the primary web page for the GNU Guile 1.9.15
release is 2011-01-02 (2011 January 02), instead of the correct date
2011-02-02 (2011 February 02).
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
-Original Message-
From: Neil Jerram
To: Ludovic Courtès
Cc: guile-u...@gnu.org; gu
Hi,
Mark Harig writes:
> The date listed on the primary web page for the GNU Guile 1.9.15
> release is 2011-01-02 (2011 January 02), instead of the correct date
> 2011-02-02 (2011 February 02).
Oops, my bad. Fixed, thanks!
Ludo’.
Hi,
My embryonal LilyPond GUI now works with Guile 1.9.15, but
it cannot run from cached .go files -- see below.
Can you help me with this; how do I go about debugging this?
If/once you have a working guile-gnome setup which includes gnomecanvas,
simply do
git clone git://github.com/janneke
Hello!
And thanks for the patch stream and quick fixes! :-)
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Ah, I was using a non-portable extension of isinf(x) to determine the
> sign of the infinity. This patch should fix it.
We use Gnulib’s ‘isinf’ module. It could be that it’s buggy, or it
could be improved to
On Thu 03 Feb 2011 10:14, Mark H Weaver writes:
> This patch implements the ideas outlined in my response to Mike Gran's
> recent post entitled "Effects of updated number fixes on parsing".
Applied, and thanks again for the high quality of these patches, their
commit logs, and the news entries a
On Thu 03 Feb 2011 01:38, Mark H Weaver writes:
> Ah, I was using a non-portable extension of isinf(x) to determine the
> sign of the infinity. This patch should fix it.
Applied, thanks.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
This patch implements the ideas outlined in my response to Mike Gran's
recent post entitled "Effects of updated number fixes on parsing".
In brief, it modifies scm_i_string_to_number to apply exactness
specifiers to each component _before_ calling scm_make_rectangular or
scm_make_polar, as is done
