> Sounds great to me, though Brian & Neil can always come in to correct me
> :)
Done! See commit ea28e981342fd1d381e489e57cddde97eb390442. In
addition to the main .texi payload, I adjusted the formatting on some
of your initial paragraphs and removed the descriptions of the base
and composite li
Hi Andy,
That sounds excellent. If I may ask, do you already have patches or a
git branch that adds this slot? If so, what are you doing about the
embedded objcode issue? (Changing the bytecode to leave room for it,
or hiding the slot in the C code?)
If not, why don't I just write that up first a
On Mon 21 Jun 2010 23:54, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Merry Solstice!
>
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> On Sun 20 Jun 2010 23:29, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>>
A: #:replace. Presumably the user knows what she is doing when she
Hello,
Sounds fun. Is the Prolog-on-Guile code available on-line?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Merry Solstice!
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Sun 20 Jun 2010 23:29, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>
>>> A: #:replace. Presumably the user knows what she is doing when she
>>> uses your module. If she really cares she can change the duplicate
>>> bind
Hi Noah,
On Mon 21 Jun 2010 20:19, Noah Lavine writes:
> I don't know where to store the JITed code.
The 2.2 branch probably will add a slot to objcode objects for native
code. If you want to do this, that's fine. Otherwise if you want 2.0
compat, use an object property, or equivalently, a weak
On Sun 20 Jun 2010 23:29, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi!
>
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> A: #:replace. Presumably the user knows what she is doing when she
>> uses your module. If she really cares she can change the duplicate
>> bindings resolution mechanism to disallow such impor
Heya,
On Sun 20 Jun 2010 23:23, Julian Graham writes:
>> I think that Neil would probably have the most useful feedback, as I
>> think he has the most global view of the manual. I am inclined to think
>> that the level of detail is appropriate, though I imagine that Neil and
>> Brian are cringin
Hello all,
I have hit a snag in my attempt to add a JIT backend to Guile: I don't
know where to store the JITed code.
There was a discussion of this a few weeks ago in which it was decided
to try to make a simple and quick JIT engine that would be invisible
to Scheme, hoping to eventually make a
Hi, I've come pretty far in writing a parser for prolog. It's a PEG
parser without packrat and interestingly it is done by doing a simple
modding of a more standard match construct. The parser is custamizable
and it is pretty easy to add new user operators for prolog as you can in
e.g. gnuprolog.
10 matches
Mail list logo