On 9 Jan, 2010, at 22:41, Andy Wingo wrote:
scheme@(guile-user)> ,option interp #t
Aha, thanks.
This was an interesting bug (see commit c5f171027d9 if you are
interested).
I honestly don't know enough of the internals of Guile to comment,
but I appreciate the pointer.
I fixed thi
Greets,
On Sat 09 Jan 2010 11:44, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
> Would there be any interest in adding (ice-9 accumulate) to Guile?
>
> -
> http://www.gnuvola.org/software/guile/doc/Efficient-Accumulation.html
Speaking only for myself, I would be unlikely to use it; but OTOH I am
not against having
Hi,
On Fri 08 Jan 2010 18:41, Daniel Llorens del Río
writes:
> On 7 Jan, 2010, at 17:29, Andy Wingo wrote:
>
>> Could be that the tests are running only with the interpreter, and the
>> bugs that you're seeing only appear when an array is attempted to be
>> serialized out to object code.
>
> Mm
Hi,
Reviving an old thread...
On Fri 11 Dec 2009 16:05, Mike Gran writes:
>> On Sun 06 Dec 2009 21:43, Linas Vepstas writes:
>>
>> > 2009/12/6 Mike Gran :
>> >>
>> >>> > need to call (setlocale LC_ALL "")
>> >>
>> >> But for Guile to store characters as codepoints, declaring a locale
>> >> pret
Would there be any interest in adding (ice-9 accumulate) to Guile?
- http://www.gnuvola.org/software/guile/doc/Efficient-Accumulation.html
I can see several arguments against doing so:
- It is a thin layer around (ice-9 q) functionality; possible to
reimplement using (ice-9 q), in fact. When
