On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 17:25 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Mike Gran writes:
> > For gcc, -Wtype-limits will catch this at compile time.
>
> IIUC this is precisely a compile-time warning. :-)
It is a compile time warning that is default for Greg, but apparently
not for Andy or I.
-Mike
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mike Gran writes:
>
>> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 09:56 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
>>> From my autobuild on master
>>>
>>> vm-i-scheme.c:437: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range
>>> of data type
>>
>> For gcc, -Wtype-limits will catch this
Mike Gran writes:
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 09:56 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> From my autobuild on master
>>
>> vm-i-scheme.c:437: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range
>> of data type
>
> For gcc, -Wtype-limits will catch this at compile time.
IIUC this is precisely a compile
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 09:56 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> From my autobuild on master
>
> vm-i-scheme.c:437: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of
> data type
For gcc, -Wtype-limits will catch this at compile time. Maybe we should
put that in the GCC_CFLAGS in the configure.i
Mike Gran writes:
> I wrote the string-internals tests to indicate to me when I'd done
> something that had unexpected side-effects. They are intentionally
> white-box; they are intentionally reflexive.
OK, I understand now. Then if it's useful to you, well, it's indeed
useful. :-)
> But, I
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 15:53 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Mike Gran writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 10:38 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I just wanted to hear what you and others thought about the issue,
> because I think unit tests are a crucial part of software development.
OK. To say
From my autobuild on master
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
In file included from vm-engine.c:133,
from vm.c:322:
vm-i-scheme.c: In function 'vm_regular_engine':
vm-i-scheme.c:437: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of
data type
vm-i-scheme.c:437: warn
Mike Gran writes:
> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 10:38 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> What do you think?
>
> Keep it or dump it. It's all good.
Just to be clear: I think we can keep them, it doesn't hurt.
I just wanted to hear what you and others thought about the issue,
because I think uni
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 10:38 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Just a note that I've been meaning to send for some time.
>
> "Michael Gran" writes:
>
> > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?id=9b0c25f6d18d5be318ea3a47fd87cf7e63b689e1
>
> [...]
>
> I'm not fully convinc
Hello!
Just a note that I've been meaning to send for some time.
"Michael Gran" writes:
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?id=9b0c25f6d18d5be318ea3a47fd87cf7e63b689e1
[...]
> --- a/test-suite/tests/strings.test
> +++ b/test-suite/tests/strings.test
[...]
> +;;
> +;; string
Hi Andy,
I'm off from tomorrow until Sunday, and as GSoC seems to 'officially'
have ended, I wanted to give you a brief update on my status and plans:
Well, as to the status of the elisp compiler, you probably know -- it
basically works, just missing are a lot of built-ins and some special st
11 matches
Mail list logo
