> From: Ludovic Courtès
>
> Hello!
>
> Neil Jerram writes:
>
> >> Perhaps we should set up a GNU Guile Hackers Meeting (G²HM) by the time
> >> 2.0 is released?
> >
> > If it works for everyone, why not?
>
> To make things more concrete, how about August 22--23? It works for
> Andy and me.
>
Hello!
Neil Jerram writes:
>> Perhaps we should set up a GNU Guile Hackers Meeting (G²HM) by the time
>> 2.0 is released?
>
> If it works for everyone, why not?
To make things more concrete, how about August 22--23? It works for
Andy and me.
We could meet someplace in the Pyrénées---how nice
Hello!
Neil Jerram writes:
>> Perhaps we should set up a GNU Guile Hackers Meeting (G²HM) by the time
>> 2.0 is released?
>
> If it works for everyone, why not?
To make things more concrete, how about August 22--23? It works for
Andy and me.
We could meet someplace in the Pyrénées---how nice
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:02:38 +0200 (CEST)
From: Kjetil S. Matheussen
To: Bill Schottstaedt
Cc: cmd...@ccrma.stanford.edu, guile-devel-requ...@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [CM] funny scheme code
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Bill Schottstaedt wrote:
For some reaso
Daniel Kraft writes:
> Hi,
>
> I think I got the test-suite as well as a basic macro implementation
> (the compiler framework is really cool, that was fairly easy to do);
> recursive macros do not yet work, but otherwise it looks fine.
>
> However, I want to tackle quasi-quotes (besides others) n
Hi all,
in the %nil thread a suggestion was brought up to support the `flet'
construct (and `flet*' as well, if we choose to do so at all, I favour)
in Guile's upcoming elisp implementation that behaves just like a let
for function-slot bindings, enabling dynamic scoping for them.
It is no "
On Jul 20, 2009, at 04:12, Daniel Kraft wrote:
No, I don't think there is. `let' can't operate on function slots.
Not in the main emacs lisp implementation. However, cl-macs.el
provides an "flet" macro that does work on function slots; it uses
the "letf" macro which expands to include a use
Hi Neil,
Neil Jerram writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
[...]
>>> Array_handle_release is a bad idea.
>>
>> Fair enough.
>
> FWIW, I agree (I think with both of you) that `we might need it in
> future' is not a good argument, but that API compatibility is
Ken Raeburn wrote:
On Jul 19, 2009, at 16:10, Neil Jerram wrote:
BTW, I implemented also the function bindings of symbols using this
fluid-based dynamic scoping at the moment -- but on second thought,
there's no scoping at all for function slots (all are global), is
there?
No, I don't think th
