Hello,
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Mon 06 Jul 2009 21:30, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
>> Yes. OTOH, the doc doesn't say that concurrent array accesses are safe,
>> so array accesses are supposed to be synchronized at the application
>> level, using mutexes, I suppose.
>
> They sh
Hi Guilers,
I went to try out some of the traps / tracing features in the debugger
last night, and I ran into some compilation issues with `(ice-9
debugging ice-9-debugger-extensions)'. A patch that resolves them is
attached -- I haven't pushed because I'm not sure I fully understand
the broader
Hi,
On Mon 06 Jul 2009 21:30, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> Good question. I suppose you have this case in mind:
>>
>> (define s0 (string "foo"))
>> (define s1 (substring/shared s0 0))
>> (define s2 (substring/shared s1 0))
>> (par-for-each (lambda
Attached are patches to optimize %nil handling, along with some fixes
to %nil-handling bugs, as I outlined in my recent posts.
Four patches are attached. The first.patch is the most important, and
is a prerequisite for the others. In brief it does the following:
* Renumbers the IFLAG constants
