2009/6/19 Ludovic Courtès :
> We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 1.9.0.
FYI,
'make check' fails for me, with the blow. Should I ignore
this, or dig into it?
--linas
Everything before the below seems to have passed.
Then...
Running alist.test
Running and-let-star.test
Running arbiters
2009/6/19 Ludovic Courtès :
> We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 1.9.0.
...
> provide
> feedback to `guile-de...@gnu.org'.
Hmm. 'libunistring' is so new that not even debian
has a package for it. Its also labelled as 'alpha'.
You sure you want to/need to have a dependency on this?
--li
We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 1.9.0. This is the first
pre-release of what will eventually become the 2.0 release series. It
provides many new noteworthy features, most notably the addition of a
compiler and virtual machine. We encourage you to test them and provide
feedback to `g
I upgraded the sources to the very latest ones.
I did not change the scm_init_programs() prototype.
Under Cygwin, compilation advanced much more with newer sources (yeah!), but it
gave another error:
GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 ../meta/uninstalled-env guile-tools compile -o "ice-9/i18n.
go" "ice-9/i18n.
"carlo.bramix" writes:
> make[3]: Entering directory `/home/Carlo/guile/module'
> /usr/bin/mkdir -p `dirname system/base/pmatch.go`
> ../pre-inst-guile-env ../guile-tools compile -o "system/base/pmatch.go"
> "/cygdrive/c/msys/1.0/home/Carlo/guile-svn/module/system/base/pmatch.scm"
BTW, this is
Neil Jerram writes:
> I'm really not sure. It's an interesting idea. And I think it
> touches on the part of GNU philosophy that tries not to draw a firm
> line between users and developers. Do you think it's worth asking
> people on gnu-prog-discuss?
Yes, why not. Would you like to do this?
Neil Jerram writes:
> Can you remind me how you're compiling? Also is guile.exe really an
Here I mean libguile/guile.exe^
Neil
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Neil Jerram writes:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>
>>> I think GNU users, especially on non-GNU platforms (proprietary Unices,
>>> etc.), have come to know what Gnulib is, and to appreciate it
>>> (hopefully), which is why I thought it woul
Neil Jerram writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> I think GNU users, especially on non-GNU platforms (proprietary Unices,
>> etc.), have come to know what Gnulib is, and to appreciate it
>> (hopefully), which is why I thought it would make sense to mention it.
>
> Perhaps it shoul
"carlo.bramix" writes:
> Hello,
> this is the command that I gave me some results:
>
> $ ./pre-inst-guile-env ./libtool --mode=execute gdb --args libguile/guile.exe
> -c '(display "foo")'
>
> As you can see I added "--args" option to GDB.
Thanks, good point.
> Since I had no idea about those u
"carlo.bramix" writes:
> Hello,
> this is what I get with this test:
>
> $ set - '(display "foo")' && echo "--${1}--" && echo "--${2}--"
> --(display "foo")--
>
Great, that is the expected output.
Neil
Andreas Rottmann writes:
> As long as nothing is set in stone, perhaps you want to consider
> following the XDG basedir spec[0], which would suggest using something
> under ~/.cache/ per default; this would make e.g. having reasonable
> backup policies easier, as stuff under ~/.cache can be safel
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I think GNU users, especially on non-GNU platforms (proprietary Unices,
> etc.), have come to know what Gnulib is, and to appreciate it
> (hopefully), which is why I thought it would make sense to mention it.
Perhaps it should go in a new section of the NE
Hi Carlo,
"carlo.bramix" writes:
> : In procedure dynamic-func in expression (dynamic-call
> "scm_init_programs" (dynamic-link "libguile")):
> : No error
Can you try to change the following lines in :
--8<---cut here---start->8---
SCM_INTERNAL void scm_init
Hello,
I tried the same thing with cygwin I got:
$ ./pre-inst-guile -c '(display "foo")'
argc=3
argv[0]=/home/Carlo/guile/libguile/.libs/guile
argv[1]=-c
argv[2]=(display "foo")
foo
But the compilation failed even under cygwin; here you are what happens:
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/Carlo/
Hello,
this is the command that I gave me some results:
$ ./pre-inst-guile-env ./libtool --mode=execute gdb --args libguile/guile.exe
-c '(display "foo")'
As you can see I added "--args" option to GDB.
Without "--args" option, GDB says:
C:\msys\1.0\home\Carlo\guile/(display "foo"): Invalid argu
Hi,
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Thu 18 Jun 2009 22:28, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>
> + uniform-array->bytevector
I would not export it from `(rnrs bytevector)' given that it has nothing
to do with RnRS.
>>>
>>> No, but it does have
Hello,
this is what I get with this test:
$ set - '(display "foo")' && echo "--${1}--" && echo "--${2}--"
--(display "foo")--
Sincerely,
Carlo Bramini.
-- Initial Header ---
>From : "Neil Jerram" n...@ossau.uklinux.net
To : "carlo.bramix" carlo.bra...@libero.
Howdy,
On Thu 18 Jun 2009 22:28, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
+ uniform-array->bytevector
>>>
>>> I would not export it from `(rnrs bytevector)' given that it has nothing
>>> to do with RnRS.
>>
>> No, but it does have to with bytevectors... Where
Hi!
"Andy Wingo" writes:
> +** Scheme expresssions may be commented out with #;
> +
> +#; comments out an entire expression. See the R6RS for more information.
Is there any difference between SRFI-62 and R6RS here? If not, let's
mention the former, which is older than the latter.
Thanks,
Ludo
20 matches
Mail list logo
