l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello!
>
> Neil Jerram writes:
>
>> Here is a proposed patch for branch_release-1-8.
>
> At first sight this looks good to me.
Thanks! And here's the corresponding patch for master. It's slightly
different, because scm_join_thread_timed in master allows
Hi!
On Sun 24 May 2009 00:03, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I'm slightly concerned that doing things ahead of time rather than just
> in time (i.e., lazily) would have a negative impact on the interpreter's
> start-up time, which may be noticeable for short-lived scripts.
In the guile
Hello!
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Sat 23 May 2009 11:52, Neil Jerram writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>
>>> With psyntax running a pre-analysis phase on all source code, we can do
>>> away with lazy memoization entirely -- a neat hack, but it made eval.c
>>> buggy and impenetrable. I'll write mor
Hi Neil,
On Sat 23 May 2009 11:52, Neil Jerram writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> With psyntax running a pre-analysis phase on all source code, we can do
>> away with lazy memoization entirely -- a neat hack, but it made eval.c
>> buggy and impenetrable. I'll write more about that in the future.
Andy Wingo writes:
> With psyntax running a pre-analysis phase on all source code, we can do
> away with lazy memoization entirely -- a neat hack, but it made eval.c
> buggy and impenetrable. I'll write more about that in the future.
Anticipating your "more in the future", do you mean that the
p
