request review: branch "wingo"

2009-03-27 Thread Andy Wingo
Hi, On the "wingo" branch in the main repository, you will find the following patches: The following changes since commit 0fe95f9c4ce063781e79a15bc123c57c33ef9755: Ludovic Courtès (1): Improve wording in `libguile/Makefile.am' regarding stack calibration. are available

Re: stack calibration

2009-03-27 Thread Julian Graham
I do this as well, FWIW. > I always set the stack limit higher, so that I can run a version > that has been compiled without optimization, for the sake of > GDB.

Re: stack calibration

2009-03-27 Thread Mike Gran
> From: Andy Wingo > > So I have a proposal. We should set the stack limit to 60k words. I always set the stack limit higher, so that I can run a version that has been compiled without optimization, for the sake of GDB. -Mike Gran

stack calibration

2009-03-27 Thread Andy Wingo
Hey Guilers, The recent commit to compile with the stack calibration file, 7ca96180f00800414a9cf855e5ca4dceb9baca07, breaks compilation because the compile scripts have hash-bang lines like this: #!/bin/sh # -*- scheme -*- exec ${GUILE-guile} -e '(@ (scripts compile) compile)' -s $0 "$@" !# Also

Re: Guile 1.8 success on `i386-apple-darwin9.6.0'

2009-03-27 Thread Neil Jerram
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Good morning! Hello again! >> Just one nit: I think there's now only 1 piece of Automake magic being >> relied on, so you could update that text (in Makefile.am) and remove >> the "2. ". > > Right, I did this: > > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gui

Re: Guile 1.8 success on `i386-apple-darwin9.6.0'

2009-03-27 Thread Greg Troxel
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi Greg, > > Greg Troxel writes: > >> I don't think that's true at all. It could be that for running Linux on >> arm pdas that's what most people do, but for the far more general case >> there is normal cross compiling as autoconf has supported for years

Re: Guile 1.8 success on `i386-apple-darwin9.6.0'

2009-03-27 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Greg, Greg Troxel writes: > I don't think that's true at all. It could be that for running Linux on > arm pdas that's what most people do, but for the far more general case > there is normal cross compiling as autoconf has supported for years. > > I am working on a project that does cross bu

Re: Guile 1.8 success on `i386-apple-darwin9.6.0'

2009-03-27 Thread Greg Troxel
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hmm, right. OTOH, my impression was that tools like Scratchbox had > taken the world over, meaning that cross-compilation usually takes place > as "native" compilation in an emulated target environment. I don't think that's true at all. It could be that

Re: Again on Windows support

2009-03-27 Thread carlo.bramix
Hello, I confirm that the problem on undeclared alloca() function has been fixed after this change. Sincerely, Carlo Bramini. -- Initial Header --- >From : guile-devel-bounces+carlo.bramix=libero...@gnu.org To : guile-devel@gnu.org Cc : Date : Tue, 2

Re: Again on Windows support

2009-03-27 Thread carlo.bramix
Hello, I did a patch in the usual way instead of using GIT. I hope it will be ok anyways. Actually this patch adds the fixes described into the previous emails (still need to know if the mapping created in function make_objcode_by_mmap() needs to be freed somewhere or not!); I was not really ablt

Re: Guile 1.8 success on `i386-apple-darwin9.6.0'

2009-03-27 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Good morning! Neil Jerram writes: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> Maybe we could detect in `configure' whether we are >> cross-compiling and conditionalize build of >> `stack-limit-calibration.scm' on that? > > No, that sounds too tricky. I'm persuaded now that your change is > goo