Hi,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm pretty sure the case of not using the already installed system
> .scm files while building is handled now. I'm thinking more along the
> lines of some user wanted to override a system file for some
> reason. This issue came up for me when I wanted to use a n
Heya Dale,
On Thu 18 Sep 2008 22:49, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm pretty sure the case of not using the already installed system .scm
> files while building is handled now.
It is, but only because the uninstalled dirs are before the installed
dirs.
I committed a patch to the vm branch to r
Hi Neil,
"Neil Jerram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm just a bit confused about %Z, because it seems to me that the
> documentation contradicts the test.
>
> Here's the doc change:
>
>> +Note that @samp{%Z} always ignores the @code{tm:zone} in @var{tm};
>> +instead it prints just the current z
Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu 18 Sep 2008 00:57, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Basically, a .go file will be preferred over a .scm file even if the
> > .scm file is earlier in the load-path. I think that the file earlier
> > in the load-path should win.
>
> A f
Hi,
On Thu 18 Sep 2008 00:57, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Basically, a .go file will be preferred over a .scm file even if the
> .scm file is earlier in the load-path. I think that the file earlier
> in the load-path should win.
A few thoughts:
(1) Guile shouldn't have installed paths (its s
On Tue 16 Sep 2008 23:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> The attached patch fixes first-time compilation, by ensuring SRFI
> modules are built before "guile-tools compile" is ever run.
Merged, thanks. I wish that all of the C could be compiled before all of
the scheme, though. Perh
Ludovic Courte`s wrote:
Hi,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Do we have a consensus?
Yes, fine by me, but no rush. ;-)
From a Guile-user and not developer perspective, the sequence needs to be:
1. the most retrograde platform must have all the GH capabilities in
the SCM int
"Neil Jerram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2008/9/18 Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I would suggest that we drop that mention of dynwinds from the manual.
Just to clarify: I'm suggesting fixing the manual so that it conforms to
the implementation, not the opposite.
> In my view, this
"Neil Jerram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2008/9/18 Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Yes, fine by me, but no rush. ;-)
>
> Do you mean anything specific by "no rush" here?
I just meant I'm not gonna do it Right Now but that's fine by me if
somebody else does.
Thanks,
Ludo'.
2008/9/18 Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I submitted this bug:
>
> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?24292
That's great, thanks.
> I would suggest that we drop that mention of dynwinds from the manual.
In my view, this part is still useful:
"You must take care to always unreser
2008/9/18 Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Do we have a consensus?
>
> Yes, fine by me, but no rush. ;-)
Do you mean anything specific by "no rush" here? I think we should do
it before we forget that we have a consensus. :-) Han-We
2008/9/17 Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed 17 Sep 2008 21:42, "Neil Jerram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> 2008/9/16 Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> This new instruction, mv-call, takes three byte arguments, and at least
>>> two stack arguments. The byte arguments are the number of ar
Hi,
"Neil Jerram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
and (2) I don't know of any other function that does a dynwind behind
the scenes (IOW, let's not break the "rule of least surprise").
>>
>> I meant "I don't know of a function that does a `dynwind_begin'
>> *alone*" (of course there are plen
Hi,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do we have a consensus?
Yes, fine by me, but no rush. ;-)
Ludo'.
2008/9/18 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Basically, a .go file will be preferred over a .scm file even if the .scm
> file is earlier in the load-path. I think that the file earlier in the
> load-path should win.
>
> Thoughts?
I agree. I think that's what Emacs does, and Emacs is a good example
to fol
15 matches
Mail list logo
