Hi,
I've enabled the VM repl by default on the vm branch. Here's a brief
annotated tour:
$ ./pre-inst-guile
Guile Scheme interpreter 0.5 on Guile 1.9.0
Copyright (C) 2001-2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Enter `,help' for help.
A very pleasant introduction, no? And totally co
Hi there,
I'm debugging an issue here that cause the GC asserts to trigger,
with the values compared being off by one. The problem disappears
when I compile --without-threads. The program does not explicitly
create threads
Is there any code in GUILE that would create a thread (possibly
leadin
2008/9/7 Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/9/7 Ken Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Still keeping it in the back of my mind, but first my attempts to use SVK to
>> mirror the Emacs repository broke (naturally, after it had looked solid
>> enough that I had switched to it for my Emacs develo
Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
>> You might construe that I would like to turn Guile development into
>> LilyPond development. That is not necessarily the case, but I keep
>> misunderstanding what people expect in this community. I am assuming
>> that developers in general are interested in a more liv
Hi Julian,
"Julian Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ...And then I just reapplied the fix by hand because it was only one
> line. :) A patch against the branch is attached. Let me know if
> there are any problems with it.
Perfect, thanks! I added a `NEWS' entry as well.
Ludo'.
Hey!
"Neil Jerram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For me, almost all of my time since becoming a maintainer has been
> absorbed by working on bug fixes, largely to do with slightly odd
> platforms (e.g. Mac) or architectures (e.g. ia64). IMO it was
> worthwhile to focus on such bug reports soon a
Hi Han-Wen,
You're confrontational, indeed.
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - Rolling back a patch is preferred over fixing actual problems.
What makes you say so?
> - Nobody has enough initiative to put a single strategic #ifdef in the
> code.
To me, it looks like the "strat
Hi,
Clinton Ebadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps a macro could be used instead (is it possible to pass entire
> blocks of code to a macro using something like CYCLE_DETECTING({
> code ... }) in C?).
Sure, something like `scm_i_for_each (element, list)' that expands to a
tortoise-and-
Hello!
"Neil Jerram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm sorry but I'm still really struggling to see how this change helps us...
Yes, I see... ;-)
I'm taking it the other way: I can't see how one can argue for unneeded
run-time overhead.
> 2008/9/1 Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> You'
