Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
> I don't think there's any such problem, at least on GNU/Linux. See:
>
> $ ./pre-inst-guile
> guile> (getenv "LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH")
>
> "/home/ludo/src/guile/libguile:/home/ludo/src/guile/guile-readline:/home/ludo/src/guile/srfi:"
>
> The first directory is the bu
Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
> I don't observe this failure on my x86 (Core(TM)2 Duo) laptop.
Let me try to look at this during next week. As a kludge, you can #if 0 the
asserts; although the stats will be off (as well as the allocation strategy),
nothing bad should happen.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I just added `master' to the daily build on x86-64 [0] and it fails
> there:
>
> lt-guile: gc.c:609: scm_i_gc: Assertion `scm_i_gc_sweep_stats.collected +
> scm_cells_allocated == scm_i_gc_sweep_stats.swept' failed.
>
> http://autobuild.josefsson.
Hello!
Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The `vm' branch in the guile repo is coming along nicely. It fully
> self-compiles, passes test suites, has a really useful repl, etc etc.
> There are some problems with call/cc that will be fixed in the future,
> but it's mostly correct.
Thanks fo
Hello,
Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There could be two fixes. One would be to assume that the Scheme code
> that calls %fast-slot-ref et al is well-formed, and thus we need no
> bounds checking. It's all in goops.scm, so this would be a decent
> assumption. The other would be to use a
Hey,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just debugged myself silly to find a problem in the new GC as it was
> running the test suite. As it turns out, the test suite is loading
> extension modules (i18n.so to be precise) from the path I supplied
> in LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Since this w
Hi,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys escreveu:
>> Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
>>> +/*
>>> + Classic MIT Hack, see e.g. http://www.tekpool.com/?cat=9
>>> + */
>>> +int scm_i_uint_bit_count(unsigned int u)
>>>
>>> (BTW, it'd make sense to use Gnulib's `count-one-bits'
Hi,
I just added `master' to the daily build on x86-64 [0] and it fails
there:
lt-guile: gc.c:609: scm_i_gc: Assertion `scm_i_gc_sweep_stats.collected +
scm_cells_allocated == scm_i_gc_sweep_stats.swept' failed.
http://autobuild.josefsson.org/guile/log-200808220956770665000.txt
GDB forensi
Hi,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm always for faster release cycles, but wouldn't it be good to push out
> 1.10 now, and merge the VM (which is a large change) afterwards?
I think there are still a lot of small, incremental improvements to be
made in 1.8. That is admittedly
Hi,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I did a big rewrite of the garbage collector between 1.6 and 1.8; See
>
> commit 06e80f59f976c8dda5161804f611f489ec2948a2
> Author: Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue Dec 10 13:26:25 2002 +
>
> and following commits.
>
> This
10 matches
Mail list logo
