i686-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/linux-x86/src/guil
e-1.9.git -I.. -I/home/lilydev/vc/gub/target/linux-x86/src/guile-1.9.git/lib -I.
./lib -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -MT libguile_la-scmsigs.lo -MD -MP -MF .
deps/libguile_la-scmsigs.Tpo -c /home/lilydev/vc/gub/tar
> I just ran the statprof unit test and it seems to still be OK. Perhaps
> in Julien's run, there simply was not enough time in user space relative
> to the sampling frequency. (Certainly statprof should deal with this in
> a more intelligent fashion.)
That's certainly possible (I take it you're u
Alright, I give up. I'm still not exactly sure why my implementation
is as slow as it is; I have a hunch that I'm taking too long
processing the list of actual parameters, but I haven't been able to
glean many specifics from statprof. Marc also employs some nifty but
un-Scheme-y (to my mind, at l
Han-Wen Nienhuys escreveu:
> Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
Off the top of my head: incorrect indentation, missing spaces around
brackets, and more importantly comments (see (standards.info)Comments).
Andy Wingo escreveu:
> Let me know if you have thoughts about this plan! My hope would be that
> once there are no or very few and solvable regressions, we could merge
> this to master and call it 1.10 or 2.0.
I'm always for faster release cycles, but wouldn't it be good to push out
1.10 now, and
Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
>> A likely candidate is the patch from you that I applied. In
>> particular,
>> 4c7016dc06525c7910ce6c99d97eb9c52c6b43e4
>
> Well, that's a good candidate since it's the last significant change
> that was done to the GC on `master'. However, Kevin's original post
> comp
Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
>
>>> Off the top of my head: incorrect indentation, missing spaces around
>>> brackets, and more importantly comments (see (standards.info)Comments).
>> The code I went through sho
Hello,
Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun 17 Aug 2008 14:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I have a request: can you put the gnulib into the repository of GUILE
>>> itself?
>>
>> Yeah, we could do that.
>
> I thi
Hello,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
>> Off the top of my head: incorrect indentation, missing spaces around
>> brackets, and more importantly comments (see (standards.info)Comments).
>
> The code I went through should not have that; please point me to
Hi!
Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Guile-gnome does, when registering a new port type, for gnome-vfs. The
> port API isn't threadsafe, and also sucks as I mentioned ;) From
> gnome-vfs/gnome/gw/gnome-vfs-port.c:
>
> #define LOCK scm_i_pthread_mutex_lock (&scm_i_port_table_mutex)
> #defi
10 matches
Mail list logo
