Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
> Hi Han-Wen,
>
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I've implemented an env var GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE (- some lilypond users
>> were complaining that running lily on large sets of files keeps
>> growing the heap forever, leading to trashing).
>
> Of course
> On NetBSD-current/amd64, the branch_release-1-8 branch fails to build.
> _GNU_SOURCE is defined in config.h, and also in two files. With the
> following change, it builds and 'gmake check' succeeds.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I suspect that is because you had
autoreconf'd and config
Hi,
Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On NetBSD-current/amd64, the branch_release-1-8 branch fails to build.
> _GNU_SOURCE is defined in config.h, and also in two files. With the
> following change, it builds and 'gmake check' succeeds.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I suspect that is bec
On NetBSD-current/amd64, the branch_release-1-8 branch fails to build.
_GNU_SOURCE is defined in config.h, and also in two files. With the
following change, it builds and 'gmake check' succeeds.
I'm not sure why _GNU_SOURCE is there; it seems guile should be mostly
relying on POSIX-specified thin
Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
> Hi Han-Wen,
>
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I've implemented an env var GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE (- some lilypond users
>> were complaining that running lily on large sets of files keeps
>> growing the heap forever, leading to trashing).
>
> Of course
Hi Han-Wen,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've implemented an env var GUILE_MAX_HEAP_SIZE (- some lilypond users
> were complaining that running lily on large sets of files keeps
> growing the heap forever, leading to trashing).
Of course, the correct fix would be to help the GC
2008/8/13 Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Yes, though I'll have to find out what's appropriate since changes to
> some control fields can require a manual review by the ftpmasters. As
> it stands now, I don't think this will affect guile with respect to
> lenny.
[...]
> Note that if I reca
