Well, there's a reference implementation of SRFI-89 that (I think)
could just be dropped in and used, now that we have SRFI-88-style
keywords. I was just hoping that the existence of `(ice-9 optargs)'
would make possible a more compact / potentially more efficient
implementation.
> Would it be a
Hi Julian,
"Julian Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I've taken a stab at implementing SRFI-89, using Guile's existing
> (ice-9 optargs) module -- my thinking was that the two were similar
> enough to make it worthwhile to have optargs do most of the heavy
> lifting. What I've done is add
Hello!
Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So really, we are left with no information to write into the file,
> although the side effects do persist during compilation. Perhaps there
> is a better way to do this, but I suspect it involves compilation
> phases, which would have to be linked t
Hi,
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> That "no duplicate" test in `popen.test' leaves a zombie behind it [0].
>> The fix would be to `waitpid' the process created by `open-input-pipe'
>> (see attached patch), but that makes it hang, waiting
