Hi,
Stanislav Ievlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 02:13:38PM +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Court?s) writes:
>>
>> > As for this:
>> >
>> > async.c: In function 'scm_i_queue_async_cell':
>> > async.c:250: warning: ignoring return value of 'wr
Hi,
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>
>> It also fixes (unless I'm mistaken!) the computation of the number of
>> cells swept/collected in `scm_i_sweep_some_cards ()'.
>
> I didn't really look at this change ... is it an actual bug fix? You
>
Hi Han-Wen,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès schreef:
>>
>> But please, relax about performance, we still haven't run any meaningful
>> benchmark. ;-)
>
> btw, is there any news on this patch? I'm quite keen on dumping
> LilyPond's Rational class in favor of Scheme