Stanislav Ievlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> You have problems with optimization disabled?
We don't, but gcc 4 does :). (Bloated stack usage in the code gcc
generates for the guile eval func.)
___
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> It also fixes (unless I'm mistaken!) the computation of the number of
> cells swept/collected in `scm_i_sweep_some_cards ()'.
I didn't really look at this change ... is it an actual bug fix? You
could think about it for the 1.8 branch if so.
_
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Why do you say that? Do you think that all the dev work we do should
> be going into the 1.8 stable series?
Yep. Vote for more out sooner. (Until something fundamental diverges
wildly of course ...)
___
Gu
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 10:23:31AM +0200, Ludovic Court?s wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stanislav Ievlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > : In expression (vector-length syntmp-x-1008):
> > : Stack overflow
>
> Did you compile with `-O0'? If so, make sure you compile at least with
> `-O1'.
You have problems
