"John Sullivan via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can you please let us know whether Guile would still like to be
> listed on the consolidated help wanted page, [...]
Please remove Guile from that page.
Thanks!
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm inclined to remove the short-circuit
>
> if (size <= old_size)
> return where;
>
> from scm_must_realloc, ie. if you ask to decrease a block then
> actually do it, which is what 1.8 has now.
Sounds good to me.
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, I see off_t is exposed through the ptob port descriptor
> funcs, so implicitly changing to off64_t would break applications.
I think we need to redo the public port API anyway, for Unicode and to
clean it up. At that time, we can also get large
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What can be said in the manual about `equal?' on arrays these days?
> Can vectors and 1-dim arrays be compared with equal now? Is it still
> the case that all shared arrays have to be compared with
> `array-equal?' ?
It should clearly be possible to use e
