Re: [PATCH] GC code cleanup #2

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Please, can somebody review this patch? Looks OK, but I can't apply - I get =20 at line endings once more. ___ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu

Re: Another load path idea

Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK, let's proceed with the minimal first step of supporting an > optional config file, > $sysconfdir/guile/${EFFECTIVE-VERSION}/load-path.scm, which just > contains the load path (as a list of strings). > > If this file doesn't exist, behaviour is unchange

Re: doc libdir and C code modules

Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> I didn't realize that Autoconf could do @libdir@ substitutions so >> conveniently. > > Actually I had it a bit wrong, the usual autoconf $(libdir) value > needs to get expanded by some shell/make. That'd be why

Re: [PATCH] GC code cleanup #2

Hi folks, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > 2006-01-04 Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * libguile/gc-segment.c (scm_i_sweep_some_cards): Take a SWEEP_STATS > argument. Don't refer to SCM_GC_CELLS_COLLECTED and > SCM_CELLS_ALLOCATED. If SEG->FIRST_TIME, le