[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Han-Wen Nienhuys) writes:
> isn't it tighter (one compare less) to put a
>
> free_count --;
>
> in the scm_tc_free_cell case?
Maybe. But is it such a big deal? ;-)
Thanks,
Ludovic.
___
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Han-Wen Nienhuys) writes:
> I think that GUILE creates garbage as a side effect of evaluating
> code. If think that nothing needs to be swept, try disabling GC during
> startup, and see how well it performs memory-wise.
I did try commenting out all calls to `scm_i_gc ()' and ru
Hi,
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems completely wrong for the defining module to be responsible
> for guessing which of its bindings might have the same name as other
> bindings in the wide world outside that module.
I disagree. The set of core bindings is not supposed to be v
