Re: [PATCH] Removed a useless GC invocation

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi, > > In `next_fluid_num ()', an `scm_gc ()' call was systematically triggered > at startup time. This patch fixes this. > Looks good to me. Applied, thanks. Neil ___ Guile-devel mailing list G

Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3

Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> (Sudden confusion: Are fluids part of R5RS? If so, why do we need the >> parameters SRFI? I guess I need to go and reread it.) > > No no no, fluids are not part of R5RS. I think we should implement > the p