Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Guile needs it internally anyway, but when we do not export it, we can
> just implement what we need and can change it at will, of course.
I'd be inclined to leave it out for now, wait until the threading
changes have settled down.
_
Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ok, I have merged this branch now back into HEAD, which probably
> causes a lot of instability.
With glibc 2.3.2, in eval.c I had to #define _GNU_SOURCE to get
PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP from .
___
Hi,
I am not completely happy about having removed the low level thread
API.
I do think that it is not the job of Guile to provide such a thing and
I also found its presence to be confusing, when compared with the
'regular' thread API.
On the other hand, Guile itself both works on systems that
