Re: Widget descriptors as unions

2015-08-29 Thread Florian Pelz
On 08/28/2015 09:09 PM, Jean-Marie Delapierre wrote: >> Hi; > >> this mailing list is probably not the one you want to use — >> development of the GLib/GTK+ libraries is discussed on >> gtk-devel-list gnome org > >> On 14 May 2015 at 10:27, Jean-Marie Delapierre >> wrote: > >I have coded in

Re: Widget descriptors as unions

2015-08-29 Thread Jean-Marie Delapierre
Le 29/08/2015 10:13, Florian Pelz a écrit : On 08/28/2015 09:09 PM, Jean-Marie Delapierre wrote: Hi; this mailing list is probably not the one you want to use — development of the GLib/GTK+ libraries is discussed on gtk-devel-list gnome org On 14 May 2015 at 10:27, Jean-Marie Delapierre wrote:

Re: Widget descriptors as unions

2015-08-29 Thread Florian Pelz
On 08/29/2015 10:39 AM, Jean-Marie Delapierre wrote: > I have explained (I hope in a clear way, but I begin to doubt about it) > that the unions I suggest only own pointers, not child objects as you > say in your answer. I think it is clear, but you still need to declare one such union for each cl

Re: Widget descriptors as unions

2015-08-29 Thread LRN
On 29.08.2015 11:46, Florian Pelz wrote: > On 08/29/2015 10:39 AM, Jean-Marie Delapierre wrote: >> I have explained (I hope in a clear way, but I begin to doubt about it) >> that the unions I suggest only own pointers, not child objects as you >> say in your answer. > > I think it is clear, but yo

Re: Widget descriptors as unions

2015-08-29 Thread Florian Pelz
On 08/29/2015 10:53 AM, LRN wrote: > On 29.08.2015 11:46, Florian Pelz wrote: >> On 08/29/2015 10:39 AM, Jean-Marie Delapierre wrote: >>> I have explained (I hope in a clear way, but I begin to doubt about it) >>> that the unions I suggest only own pointers, not child objects as you >>> say in your

Re: Widget descriptors as unions

2015-08-29 Thread Jean-Marie Delapierre
Le 29/08/2015 11:08, Florian Pelz a écrit : On 08/29/2015 10:53 AM, LRN wrote: On 29.08.2015 11:46, Florian Pelz wrote: On 08/29/2015 10:39 AM, Jean-Marie Delapierre wrote: I have explained (I hope in a clear way, but I begin to doubt about it) that the unions I suggest only own pointers, not

Re: Widget descriptors as unions

2015-08-29 Thread Florian Pelz
On 08/29/2015 11:49 AM, Jean-Marie Delapierre wrote: > What I hope if the advantage of detecting more bugs at compilation time > is agreed by the GTK+ community is that the union type declarations > would be just included in the standard header files, allowing the > programmers to use any coding st