Hi, ALL,
It looks like all GTK_STOCK_XXX have their replacemewnts in GTK+-3.
However, GTK_STOCK_YES does not. And it is very useful item.
Is there a replacement I can use?
Thank you.
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/m
Use "Yes", but please: consider using a more descriptive label and icon
than just "yes".
Ciao,
Emmanuele.
On Saturday, August 8, 2015, Igor Korot wrote:
> Hi, ALL,
> It looks like all GTK_STOCK_XXX have their replacemewnts in GTK+-3.
>
> However, GTK_STOCK_YES does not. And it is very useful i
Emmanuele,
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> Use "Yes", but please: consider using a more descriptive label and icon than
> just "yes".
The "Yes", "No" and "Cancel" are legitimate button labels, especially if used
in one dialog.
Could you please update the documentation t
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Igor Korot wrote:
Emmanuele,
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Emmanuele Bassi
wrote:
Use "Yes", but please: consider using a more descriptive label and
icon than
just "yes".
The "Yes", "No" and "Cancel" are legitimate button labels, especially
if used
in
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Igor Korot wrote:
Emmanuele,
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
Use "Yes", but please: consider using a more descriptive label and icon
than
just "yes".
The "Yes", "No" and "Cancel" are leg
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> However, in relation to Igor's original point, giving the user options of
> Yes/No is IMO fine if your dialog asks a short, simple question that
> requires an answer of Yes or No. As in
>
> Overwrite ? Yes/No
> Send message? Yes/No
> Really
No no no. Everybody is wrong. What we need is:
[ Actually, now that I come to think about it, this is not the action
I would like to take at this time. Thankyou all the same]
[ This is precisely the action that I require, and I thank you for the
explicit dialog and verbose text in the buttons; it
