[PATCH] GIO proxy supprot

2010-05-06 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
=user/nicolas/glib.git Git: git://git.collabora.co.uk/git/user/nicolas/glib.git Branch: proxy Cheer, --- Nicolas Dufresne Software Developer at Collabora Ltd. ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinf

Re: Ige-mac-integration: New version with Cocoa interface available.

2010-05-18 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le mardi 18 mai 2010 à 09:26 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > Not really. Its up to you and us working together on making this > happen... therefore, I'd love to hear some comments from you or other > OS X developers on the GApplication branch: Maybe a first step would be to make the GApplicati

Re: Print dialog hangs for several seconds before activating

2010-06-10 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le mercredi 09 juin 2010 à 20:20 -0400, David A Benjamin a écrit : > It appears that the only sane way to interact with CUPS in a GUI > application is to use separate threads. If folks do not object the > change, > I'll try my hand at them. I would suggest to write a very thin layer that wrap

Re: [REMINDER] gtk team IRC meeting - 2010-06-22

2010-06-22 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le mardi 22 juin 2010 à 15:24 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : > this is a reminder for the GTK+ team IRC meeting, > > * date: 2010-06-22 > * time: 20:00 UTC [0] > * channel: #gtk-devel on irc.gnome.org > * agenda: > - Decisions about the latest missing accessor functions. > - Potential API

Re: Errors creating GdkPixbuf

2010-09-22 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le dimanche 05 septembre 2010 à 12:42 +0100, Andrew Wood a écrit : > (process:2153): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: > /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.24.0/gobject/gtype.c:2706: You forgot to call > g_type_init() What's you answer to GLib question (Did you forgot to call g_type_init() ?) ? signature.asc D

Re: missing symbol clock_gettime after glib rebuild

2010-11-23 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le mardi 23 novembre 2010 à 16:43 -0800, Britton Kerin a écrit : > After recompiling my glib build I get failures like this when linking > against it: > > /home/bkerin/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so: undefined reference to > `clock_gettime' > Maybe you should mention which platform (is it act

Re: libsoup + gsettings-desktop-schemas for server code

2014-03-03 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le lundi 03 mars 2014 à 09:59 -0500, Dan Winship a écrit : > So... if we're going to do anything with the proxy schemas, we should > move/rename and reorganize them at the same time. I second this, if review is needed on an appropriate design I'd be happy to help double checking it. So far things

Re: libsoup + gsettings-desktop-schemas for server code

2014-03-03 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le lundi 03 mars 2014 à 11:16 -0500, Jasper St. Pierre a écrit : > Can we do that without breaking backwards compatibility? For instance, > if I have an old proxy config, and I upgrade to a new > glib-networking / libsoup, will I, as a user, have to re-set it for > the new path layouts? Do we have

Re: libsoup + gsettings-desktop-schemas for server code

2014-03-03 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le lundi 03 mars 2014 à 16:38 +, Colin Walters a écrit : > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Nicolas Dufresne > wrote: > > Le lundi 03 mars 2014 à 09:59 -0500, Dan Winship a écrit : > Is it just proxy configuration? Are there any options from > gsettings-desktop-schema

Re: libsoup + gsettings-desktop-schemas for server code

2014-03-03 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le lundi 03 mars 2014 à 21:08 +, Colin Walters a écrit : > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Nicolas Dufresne > wrote: > > An headless deamon can be anything with any use cases. One use case > > that I came with, where the dconf model did not work was package > > m

Re: Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module"

2014-03-11 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le dimanche 09 mars 2014 à 04:03 +, narcisse doudieu siewe a écrit : > Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module" This is usually not fatal. Installing canberra-gtk would make it go away. Nicolas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part _

Re: Reinstate support for OS X versions older than 10.9

2015-09-23 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le mercredi 23 septembre 2015 à 11:47 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : > As I said on the bug, I would not close the door on supporting > versions of MacOS prior to 10.9, but given that the platform support > is not continuous, it has to fall under a cost/benefit analysis from > the perspective of

Re: Reinstate support for OS X versions older than 10.9

2015-09-23 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le mercredi 23 septembre 2015 à 15:43 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : > GLib has many masters, though, and even if GStreamer does not use the > GNotification API, said API is still there. The issue of future > features that may require bumping up the minimum requirements of the > OS still stands a

Re: [Discuss] Make a thinner Glib/GTK+ to fit tiny device better

2015-10-14 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le lundi 12 octobre 2015 à 23:24 +0800, cee1 a écrit : > Hi all, > > I'm thinking and interested in the idea of running Glib/GTK+ based > applications on tiny devices, e.g. wearable devices. > > I notice Tizen employs EFL because it is lightweight and fast. But > when went through the code, it se

Re: [Discuss] Make a thinner Glib/GTK+ to fit tiny device better

2015-10-14 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le mercredi 14 octobre 2015 à 15:16 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > I think it is fair to say that there is more interest in fixing > performance of GObject than there is in introducing a miniobject > type. Not sure if that qualifies as 'interest in lightweight objects' > or not. From GStreamer

Re: [Discuss] Make a thinner Glib/GTK+ to fit tiny device better

2015-10-15 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le jeudi 15 octobre 2015 à 22:14 +0800, cee1 a écrit : > >> providing APIs to make GTK+(also GIO) easily integrated to other > >> event > >> loop, then we use epoll() on Linux, kqueue() onBSD or even > >> libdispatch[3] - client code can use simpler event loop(e.g. no > >> locks, > >> no recursive

Re: [Discuss] Make a thinner Glib/GTK+ to fit tiny device better

2015-10-16 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le samedi 17 octobre 2015 à 01:20 +0800, cee1 a écrit : > 2015-10-16 23:46 GMT+08:00 Florian Müllner : > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:38 PM, cee1 wrote: > >> If yes, we may let GObject inherit from > >> GstMiniObject to obtain the COW feature? > > > > This would break ABI, so not something you shou

Re: [Discuss] Make a thinner Glib/GTK+ to fit tiny device better

2015-10-19 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le lundi 19 octobre 2015 à 15:57 +0800, cee1 a écrit : > Is there any examples about the limitation of this reference count > based model at hand? > > So can I say gstreamer use COW mainly for locking(similar to RCU), > not > for the purpose of removing duplication? Memory locking is a term used

Re: ABI Navigator for Gtk releases

2017-02-22 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le mercredi 22 février 2017 à 16:52 +0300, Andrey Ponomarenko a écrit : > Hello, > > I'd like to present a new project called "ABI Navigator" for > searching binary symbols (functions, global data, etc.) in Gtk and > other open-source libraries: https://abi-laboratory.pro/index.php?vie > w=navigat

Re: gtk-devel-list Digest, Vol 157, Issue 18

2017-05-29 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le dimanche 28 mai 2017 à 13:06 +0100, Daniel Boles a écrit : > On 28 May 2017 at 13:00,   wrote: > > Message: 1 > > > > Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 10:55:21 +0800 > > > > From: Cong Monkey > > > > To: gtk-devel-list > > > > Subject: will gobject-introspection build system migrate to cmake > > or

Re: First deprecate APIs and then remove them in the next major version

2017-12-13 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le mercredi 13 décembre 2017 à 17:34 +0100, Christian Schoenebeck a écrit : > > On 13 December 2017 at 12:05, Sébastien Wilmet wrote: > > > Ideally, a new major version of a library should only remove deprecated > > > APIs. > > > > The short answer is: that's not how library development works, un

Re: GitLab CI runners for non-Linux systems

2018-05-18 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le vendredi 18 mai 2018 à 19:16 +0530, Arun Raghavan a écrit : > On 18 May 2018 at 18:51, wrote: > > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:52 AM Philip Withnall > > wrote: > > > > > > Can anybody else provide and maintain CI runners for other platforms? > > > I’d particularly like to see: > > > • *BSD (pr

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

2018-09-05 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le mer. 5 sept. 2018 17:48, Ray Strode via gtk-devel-list < gtk-devel-list@gnome.org> a écrit : > hi, > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018, 6:19 PM Magnus Bergman > wrote: > >> Over the years it has been discussed from time to time to replace >> gdk-pixbuf with something else[1][2]. > > [...] > >> I finally t

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

2018-09-05 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le mercredi 05 septembre 2018 à 17:49 -0700, Christian Hergert a écrit : > On 09/05/2018 05:03 PM, Nicolas Dufresne wrote: > > > > For foreign image, yes, but for system icons, that's just an > > overhead. > > System icons should be using mmap'able caches

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

2018-09-05 Thread Nicolas Dufresne
Le mercredi 05 septembre 2018 à 18:43 -0700, Christian Hergert a écrit : > On 09/05/2018 06:18 PM, Nicolas Dufresne wrote: > > Is there any benchmark that would justify this added complexity ? Also, > > there will be more context switch, so cache misses will take more time > &