El jue, 16-09-2010 a las 20:36 +1000, Andrew Cowie escribió:
> If someone write up a list of indent options and stick the command in a
> one line script somewhere prominent (like / :)) then we can just run the
> code formatter once over the entire tree, and then just tell people to
> run it in futu
Hey,
2011/7/6 Michael Kappert
> g_type_info_get_array_type returns a GIArrayType which only distinguishes
> "C", ptr, byte and nested arrays. This does not seem to be enough to
> generate wrappers automatically. The exact array element type needs to be
> known. (Or doesn't it? I'm using CLISP's
On lun, 2011-09-26 at 13:59 +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
> For example, I would like to export this function:
>
> class Gsqlite:Database
> from G:Object
> {
> // ...
>From man g-ir-scanner:
"The suffix determines whether a file be treated as a source file (.c)
or a header file (.h).
On mié, 2012-02-01 at 08:00 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> - Restricting kinetic scrolling to touch devices is correct,
> experience-wise
Is it? I don't think Windows 8's Metro interface limits kinetic
scrolling to touch devices (but I may be misremembering here), and Allan
explicitly mentions ki
On Feb 4, 2013 4:08 PM, "Matthias Clasen" wrote:
> Just thought I should mention this, so nobody gets upset if their
> favourite 10 year old bug is WONTFIXed...
Did you close the time machine one?
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.or
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Diego Felix (Bill) wrote:
> I tried to make the gtk+ from git repository (branch broadway)
Why? That's an old development branch that has long been merged to
master; to build the broadway backend, just configure GTK+ (master or
any version >= 3.2) with --enable-br
On Mar 29, 2013 4:53 AM, "John Ralls" wrote:
> I'm unable to push a commit to gtk-osx. How do I get a git.gnome.orgadmin to
> unwedge it?
Sounds like
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/devel-announce-list/2013-March/msg6.html,
which is being worked on.
__
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Rena wrote:
> I'm wondering if somewhere there's a page explaining how I would go about
> writing my own widgets, such that they'd be available to all apps using
> introspection,
> and bindings such as lgi would be able to use them automatically?
https://wiki.gno
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Tarnyko wrote:
> GtkWindow window = gtk_window_new (GTK_WINDOW_TOPLEVEL);
> GdkWindow *w = gtk_widget_get_window (GTK_WIDGET(window));
gtk_widget_get_window() will return %NULL if the widget has not been
realized yet.
__
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Victor A. Santos
wrote:
> popover = gtk_popover_new (window);
This doesn't make sense - relative_to is the widget the popup should
point to inside window, so you'd want mbutton here; however
gtk_menu_button_set_popover() will already take care of that, so
passi
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Florian Müllner wrote:
> gtk_widget_set_halign (mbutton, GTK_ALIGN_START);
Meh, I meant set_valign() (though halign should work as well)
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 6:52 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> Apps that cannot or don't know how to
> do CSD would still be decorated, just like now => The final word still
> remains to the applications, just like now.
>
What about apps that rely on CSD for part of their UI? Will those have the
final
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:33 PM David Nečas wrote:
> As long as I can set up my DE to pretend not to support CSD, whatever
> the actual state is. Because this is, at the end, user's preference.
>
No, that does not work. All the toolkit can reasonably do is passing the
preference on to the appli
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:38 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> > Yeap, that's a god idea, but that's for menubar, I am referring to
> decorations.
>
Well yes, I'm just pointing out that GtkSettings:gtk-shell-shows-app-menu
can be misused to determine whether the app is running under GNOME and
should us
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:44 AM Allin Cottrell wrote:
> Isn't there some dissonance here: "essential UI" embedded in
> "decorations"? How did we come to this? [...] why not fix the WM
> [...] rather than conflating UI with decoration?
Because it is not about working around any WM's (or more pre
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:59 AM Paul Davis
wrote:
> consider a simple dialog. Should it have a close button or not? If the
> application adds an explicit close button, there are now two areas of the
> window as displayed by most WMs which will, upon being clicked, cause the
> window to be hidden.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:10 AM Allin Cottrell wrote:
> OK, I can see that that's a legitimate difference (I'd say a
> "design" rather than a "philosophical" one, but hey).
Sure, let's call it different designs then ...
Fact is that
> the first alternative has been the status quo for a long ti
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 12:31 PM Chris Vine
wrote:
>
> Further, there are cases where porting to GSubprocess does not actually
> do the job easily because (as I understand it) GSubprocessFlags
> can be set to either close all descriptors on exec other than those for
> stdin, stdout and stderr, or
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:38 PM, cee1 wrote:
> If yes, we may let GObject inherit from
> GstMiniObject to obtain the COW feature?
This would break ABI, so not something you should expect any time soon.
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnom
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 4:24 PM, wrote:
> These lines:
>
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/tree/gtk/gtkadjustment.c#n932
>
> Clamp the value of an adjustment so it lies between lower and upper.
No. From the documentation a couple of lines above:
"Updates the #GtkAdjustment:value property to
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:57 PM Randall Sawyer
wrote:
> how about the following modifications?
> Change "gstring.h":
> ...
> struct _GString
> {
>gchar *str;
>gsize len;
>gsize allocated_len;
>gsize utf8_len;
> };
> ...
>
Changing the size of a public struct is an ABI break, so
On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 1:26 PM Harris, TerryX
wrote:
> Including #define _GNU_SOURCE does not solve the following glib-2.56.0
compile problem.
> Has anyone else seen this error?
Yes, at the very least the person who fixed it:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795133 :-)
Cheers,
Floria
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:35 PM Sebastian Geiger (Lanoxx)
wrote:
>
> I was able to resolve the issue yesterday, and found that it was not
> directly a Problem of GTK+.
To some extent it is, I don't think its API currently allows what you
are trying to do.
On X11, the WM is a client like your app
23 matches
Mail list logo
