It seems like from this long thread that what's needed is not
native GTK+ for OS X, but rather a binary distribution of native
GTK+ for OS X...
But if it runs on only 10.4, then you are out of the game anyway.
Hub
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gt
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 18:04 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
> It seems like from this long thread that what's needed is not
> native GTK+ for OS X, but rather a binary distribution of native
> GTK+ for OS X...
Seems like the Gimp.app[1] people have figured it out sort of. They
package the Gimp with the
Crap forgot to meantion, you need the xcode legacy tools via apple
developer centre, i have the dmg if needed first, the fink xorg needs
gcc 3.1, i had gcc 3.3, gcc 3.1 would not install via fink lol.
On 09/02/2006, at 1:43 PM, electroteque wrote:
Ive already shopped around, it looks like if
Ive already shopped around, it looks like if there was a Quartz.h
available for 10.3 it just might work. What the problem is here is,
apple hold you by their finger and "force" you to "upgrade" to you can
get those features. Im pretty sure if they spent an hour or so on it
they could have t
On 2/8/06, Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It seems like from this long thread that what's needed is not
> native GTK+ for OS X, but rather a binary distribution of native
> GTK+ for OS X...
>
> Owen
Maybe we can work on that when we have a released
version of GTK+ including the OS X b
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 20:54 -0500, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, electroteque wrote:
>
> > I'd like to know, ive given up and now installing xorg via fink
> > "slowly"
>
> Me too, and probably many others. GTK will currently run "OK" on OS
> X in X11 mode, but IMO this is really
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, electroteque wrote:
I'd like to know, ive given up and now installing xorg via fink
"slowly"
Me too, and probably many others. GTK will currently run "OK" on OS
X in X11 mode, but IMO this is really a "hackers only" mode, since
apps have to started in a special way and d
I'd like to know, ive given up and now installing xorg via fink "slowly"
On 09/02/2006, at 2:27 AM, Michael Torrie wrote:
Richard Hult wrote:
It uses a few functions that are not available in 10.3. It should be
fairly easy to make it build in 10.3 or even older.
New functions as in new carbo
Richard Hult wrote:
It uses a few functions that are not available in 10.3. It should be
fairly easy to make it build in 10.3 or even older.
New functions as in new carbon functions? I can't remember all my mac
technologies off-hand, but cocoa is Objective-C, right? C apps must use
carbon?
Michael Torrie wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:19 +1100, electroteque wrote:
>
>>Can someone tell me if this is still in development or available to try
>>out ??
>>
>>http://gtk-quartz.sourceforge.net/
>
>
> No I don't think so. The only active gtk on OS X effort is now in the
> head gtk CVS
It looks like you need Quartz Composer tools which is only available
for Tiger from the looks of it !
http://developer.apple.com/cgi-bin/search.pl?
q=Quartz%2Eh&num=10&site=default_collection
What a pain.
On 08/02/2006, at 1:17 PM, electroteque wrote:
Thats what i am to find out. It ca
Thats what i am to find out. It cant find Quartz.h atm thats it. I
presume the header files are somewhere.
On 08/02/2006, at 1:13 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:19 +1100, electroteque wrote:
Can someone tell me if this is still in development or available to
try
out ??
h
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:19 +1100, electroteque wrote:
> Can someone tell me if this is still in development or available to try
> out ??
>
> http://gtk-quartz.sourceforge.net/
No I don't think so. The only active gtk on OS X effort is now in the
head gtk CVS. There is a wiki regarding it's de
Can someone tell me if this is still in development or available to try
out ??
http://gtk-quartz.sourceforge.net/
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
14 matches
Mail list logo
