Re: Persistent Binary Search Trees

2009-11-21 Thread Dana Jansens
2009/10/5 Dana Jansens : > Hello, > > I am interested in contributing code for persistent binary search > trees to the GLib project.  This would actually count as credit > towards a grad level data structures class for me, but I have a lot of > experience working with GLi

Re: Fwd: Persistent Binary Search Trees

2009-10-06 Thread Soeren Sandmann
Dana Jansens writes: > There are 2 other BSTs that would work effectively to provide a > persistent BST, while also maintaining a very efficient implementation > for when persistence is not used.  They are: >  - Treaps >  - Red-Black Trees > Treaps can be expected to outperform Red-Black Trees f

Re: Persistent Binary Search Trees

2009-10-05 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
2009/10/5 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen : > 2009/10/5 Dana Jansens : >> 2009/10/5 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen : >>> Don't let that hold you back. As far as I can imagine I don't have any >>> use case ready, but that is probably because I've never had a >>> persistent BST at hand :-) >>> >>> If I where yo

Re: Persistent Binary Search Trees

2009-10-05 Thread Mark
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Dana Jansens wrote: > Hello, > > I am interested in contributing code for persistent binary search > trees to the GLib project.  This would actually count as credit > towards a grad level data structures class for me, but I have a lot of > exper

Re: Persistent Binary Search Trees

2009-10-05 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
2009/10/5 Dana Jansens : > 2009/10/5 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen : >> Don't let that hold you back. As far as I can imagine I don't have any >> use case ready, but that is probably because I've never had a >> persistent BST at hand :-) >> >> If I where you I'd probably just develop on out-of-tree lib

Re: Persistent Binary Search Trees

2009-10-05 Thread Dana Jansens
2009/10/5 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen : > Don't let that hold you back. As far as I can imagine I don't have any > use case ready, but that is probably because I've never had a > persistent BST at hand :-) > > If I where you I'd probably just develop on out-of-tree library for > the datastructure, ke

Re: Persistent Binary Search Trees

2009-10-05 Thread Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
2009/10/5 Dana Jansens : > Hello, > > I am interested in contributing code for persistent binary search > trees to the GLib project.  This would actually count as credit > towards a grad level data structures class for me, but I have a lot of > experience working with GLi

Fwd: Persistent Binary Search Trees

2009-10-05 Thread Dana Jansens
Hello, I am interested in contributing code for persistent binary search trees to the GLib project.  This would actually count as credit towards a grad level data structures class for me, but I have a lot of experience working with GLib in the past, and developing C-based open source projects